Comparison of coronal sealing of flowable composite, resin‑modified glass ionomer, and mineral trioxide aggregate in endodontically treated teeth: An in‑vitro study

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Tavakoli Mahla; Araghi Solmaz; Fathi Amirhossein; Jalalian Shahriar

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Dental Research Journal Year:621 | Volume: | Issue: Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of coronal sealing of flowable composite, resin‑modified glass ionomer, and mineral trioxide aggregate in endodontically treated teeth: An in‑vitro study

Author(s)

Tavakoli Mahla | Araghi Solmaz | Fathi Amirhossein | Jalalian Shahriar | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Composite resinsQ4

dental leakageQ4

dental materialsQ4

root canal therapyQ4

Abstract

Background: Coronal seal is one of the essential factors that affects the success of endodontic treatment and reinforces the apical seal. The intra‑orifice barrier is an efficient alternative approach to decrease coronal leakage in endodontically treated teeth and various materials have been used for this purpose. This study aimed to compare the coronal sealing of flowable composite, resin‑modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in endodontically treated teeth. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 35 single‑canal canine teeth were divided into five groups, including flowable composite, RMGI, MTA, positive control, and negative control groups. The teeth were filled with restorative materials according to the factory’s instructions. Afterward, the samples were immersed in 2% methylene blue dye solution for 1 week at 37°C and 100% humidity condition. Finally, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and dye penetration was measured using a stereomicroscope with ×10. Data were analyzed with Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Kruskal–Wallis tests (α = 0. 05). Results: The positive control group showed the highest amount of dye penetration compared to other groups (12. 34 ± 0. 46). Dye penetration in the MTA group was significantly lower (4. 25 ± 0. 31) compared to the RMGI group (5. 94 ± 0. 24) (P = 0. 02). Moreover, while the dye penetration in the MTA group was lower than in the flowable composite group (5. 65 ± 0. 26), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0. 12). Conclusion: MTA reduces the coronal leakage and provides an acceptable coronal seal in endodontically treated teeth, especially compared to RMGI, and therefore, using MTA as an intra‑orifice barrier increases the endodontic treatment success rate

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops