Efficacy of platelet‑rich fibrin in papilla reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Dental Research Journal Year:621 | Volume: | Issue: Page(s): 1-12

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Efficacy of platelet‑rich fibrin in papilla reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Author(s)

| Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Connective tissueQ4

interdental papillaQ4

platelet‑rich fibrinQ4

systematic reviewQ4

Abstract

This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of using platelet‑rich fibrin (PRF) or Connective tissue graft (CTG) for papilla reconstruction in the treatment of black triangles. A comprehensive electronic search across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Scopus was conducted to identify the relevant randomized‑controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series. Quality assessment and meta‑analysis were performed using R Statistical Software, focusing on the parameters such as papilla height, gingival index, plaque index (PI), clinical attachment level (CAL), and pocket probing depth. Registration number: CRD42022322934. From 191 initial studies, 7 were eligible for full‑text review, with 4 RCTs and one retrospective study included in the meta‑analysis. The analysis favored CTG over PRF in terms of black triangle height at 3–6 months postsurgery and in PI improvement at 3 months. No significant differences were found in CAL and probing pocket depth. While PRF can yield satisfactory results in papilla augmentation, CTG demonstrates superior clinical outcomes in specific parameters. Further research with more extensive clinical data is warranted.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops