Navigating Scientific Peer Review with ChatGPT: Ally or Adversary?

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MohanaSundaram ArunSundar

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin Year:2024 | Volume:14 | Issue:3 Page(s): 498-498

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Navigating Scientific Peer Review with ChatGPT: Ally or Adversary?

Author(s)

MohanaSundaram ArunSundar | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

no keywordQ4

Abstract

Dear Editor, ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a breakthrough innovation by OpenAI) is being touted as a revolutionary tool with immense potential in an array of medical and pharmaceutical research and scientific peer review (SPR) processes.1,2 Studies revealed that ChatGPT might act as a complementary tool to the human SPR and aid in expediting the process, reduce reviewer fatigue, and shorten publication timelines.3,4 Of note, ChatGPT displayed remarkable competence in providing shrewd feedback, detecting methodological defects, and measuring the article’s impact on the advancement of the respective field, all with a fair inter-rater agreement.5 On the other side, a recent article by Liang et al raised an alarm regarding the perils of using ChatGPT in the peer review process. The study found remarkable alteration using ChatGPT in nearly 17% of the peer-review reports.6 The researchers have analyzed about 146 000 peer reviews submitted to the AI conferences (pre- and post-launch of ChatGPT) and found a remarkable upsurge in the use of certain buzzword adjectives like versatile, meticulous, intricate, etc. (the telltale signs of ChatGPT-written text) in the review reports.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops