مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

812
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

On Arguments for Immateriality of the Soul by Avicenna and Mulla Sadra

Pages

  123-141

Abstract

 I seek to explicate the ways in which the soul is deemed immaterial in two main strands of Islamic philosophy and then consider with the physicalistic approach some arguments for the immateriality of the soul. To do so, I first overview Avicenna's theory of the spiritual incipience (al-ḥ udū th al-rū ḥ ā nī ) of the soul and his version of substance dualism. I will then discuss Mullā Ṣ adrā 's view of the physical incipience (al-ḥ udū th al-jismā nī ) of the soul and how the soul emerges and develops towards immateriality on his account. I then overview and discuss five of the most important arguments presented by these two great Muslim philosophers in favor of the immateriality of the soul. To do so, I will also point out some of the main contemporary physicalistic views of the nature of mind and mental states. I will then argue that arguments for the immateriality of the soul – dealt with here – do not indeed target or challenge any significant versions of contemporary Physicalism. I conclude that the most important narrow physicalistic views – such as identity theory – have a very different formation than what Avicenna and Mullā-Sadrā are refuting. Also, the most important wide physicalistic theories – such as the externalist representationalism-are inconsistent with assumptions and readings of materialism in the Islamic philosophy framework and propose other types of Physicalism about the mind were not fundamentally considered by the Avicenna and Mullā-Sadrā arguments. Moreover, some of these arguments, in my opinion, involve conflations of epistemological or ontological issues.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Homazadeh Abyaneh, Mahdi. (2019). On Arguments for Immateriality of the Soul by Avicenna and Mulla Sadra. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 23(61 ), 123-141. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145588/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Homazadeh Abyaneh Mahdi. On Arguments for Immateriality of the Soul by Avicenna and Mulla Sadra. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2019;23(61 ):123-141. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145588/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Mahdi Homazadeh Abyaneh, “On Arguments for Immateriality of the Soul by Avicenna and Mulla Sadra,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 23, no. 61 , pp. 123–141, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145588/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button