مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

334
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Review on Onto-Theo-logical Structure of Metaphysics in Avicennian Philosophy Based on Heidegger and Marion's View points

Pages

  47-64

Abstract

Onto-Theo-logy recognizes the simultaneous presence of ontology and theology in metaphysics. In Onto-Theo-logy, God, in his metaphysical conception, is a being among other beings with several positive attributes, such as the cause of the universe and cause of itself, and inherent, achievable, cognitive and namable essence for mankind. Heidegger claims that Metaphysics with its Onto-Theo-logical structure reduced God to a metaphysical notion that lacks any glory for worship and prayer. Thus, the main question of the essay is: Is Avicennian philosophy an Onto-Theo-logical structure? The founding of the research is as follows: First, unlike the theologians, the discussion of God in Avicennian philosophy holds in terms of His mode of existence. Therefore, the simultaneous presence of theology and ontology in the Avicennian philosophy would be excluded. Second, Heidegger's conception of metaphysics is false and confusing, and Avicennian philosophy is also metaphysics but does not consist of the metaphysical properties claimed by Heidegger. Third, although in philosophia prima Ibn Sina speaks of God as a being, he doesn't consider the existence as the truth of God; rather he reflects existence as the implications of the truth of God. To compensate for the cognitive limitations of mankind in metaphysics, he tries to philosophically use the inner possibilities of the teachings of the divinity. In this regard, instead of using the Onto-Theo-logy positive theology, he develops his philosophy based on a negative-positive metaphysic. Fourth, components and implications of Onto-Theo-logy by Heidegger and Marion, Assuming they are right, are not present in the philosophy of Avicenna. In other words, Avicenna's philosophy does not have an Onto-Theo-logical structure.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SALAVATI, ABDOLLAH. (2019). A Review on Onto-Theo-logical Structure of Metaphysics in Avicennian Philosophy Based on Heidegger and Marion's View points. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 23(61 ), 47-64. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145597/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SALAVATI ABDOLLAH. A Review on Onto-Theo-logical Structure of Metaphysics in Avicennian Philosophy Based on Heidegger and Marion's View points. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2019;23(61 ):47-64. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145597/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ABDOLLAH SALAVATI, “A Review on Onto-Theo-logical Structure of Metaphysics in Avicennian Philosophy Based on Heidegger and Marion's View points,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 23, no. 61 , pp. 47–64, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145597/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button