DISTINCTION BETWEEN EXISTENCE AND ESSENCE ACCORDING TO IBN SINA AND SUHRAVARDI

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAHID FATEMEH; HEKMAT N.A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicennian Philosophy Journal Year:2008 | Volume:12 | Issue:39 Page(s): 112-129

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,848

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DISTINCTION BETWEEN EXISTENCE AND ESSENCE ACCORDING TO IBN SINA AND SUHRAVARDI

Author(s)

SHAHID FATEMEH | HEKMAT N.A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IBN SINAQ2

SUHRAVARDIQ2

ESSENCEQ2

EXISTENCEQ2

DISTINCTIONQ2

ACCIDENTALQ2

NECESSARYQ2

POSSIBLEQ2

Abstract

In the history of Islamic Philosophy IBN SINA and Farabi are known to be originator of the DISTINCTION between EXISTENCE and quiddity. In the philosophy of these two philosophers the DISTINCTION of EXISTENCE and quiddity is used as a proof for the EXISTENCE of God who is the end of the fIrst philosophy.According to IBN SINA positively this DISTINCTION is based on essential possibility and necessity by something else and this is also is based on a division of existent into NECESSARY and POSSIBLE being. It is here that the discussion about occurance of EXISTENCE to quiddity is propounded. Shayh by anticipating what later his predecessors including Ibn Rushed have propounded sometimes has considered this occurrence in view of conception the opposite of essential in the chapter of Isagogue and sometimes has also regarded the connection between EXISTENCE and quiddity of the kind of relation. But in view of instance (in outside) has considered EXISTENCE and quiddity as a unifIed thing.The DISTINCTION between EXISTENCE and quiddity is not propounded in illuminist philosophy in relation to the DISTINCTION between NECESSARY and POSSIBLE being and effective in proving the EXISTENCE of the Most High. SUHRAVARDI by his own explicit assertion considers the prepatetic philosophers as holding to a DISTINCTION between external EXISTENCE and ESSENCE and for this reason has objected to them. But what he has in mind of EXISTENCE, unlike what prepatetic philosophers have in view, is the concept of EXISTENCE not the truth of EXISTENCE.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAHID, FATEMEH, & HEKMAT, N.A.. (2008). DISTINCTION BETWEEN EXISTENCE AND ESSENCE ACCORDING TO IBN SINA AND SUHRAVARDI. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 12(39), 112-129. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145627/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAHID FATEMEH, HEKMAT N.A.. DISTINCTION BETWEEN EXISTENCE AND ESSENCE ACCORDING TO IBN SINA AND SUHRAVARDI. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2008;12(39):112-129. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145627/en

IEEE: Copy

FATEMEH SHAHID, and N.A. HEKMAT, “DISTINCTION BETWEEN EXISTENCE AND ESSENCE ACCORDING TO IBN SINA AND SUHRAVARDI,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 12, no. 39, pp. 112–129, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145627/en

Related Journal Papers