مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

827
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE SUBJECT OF THE SOPHIST: SOPHIST OR PHILOSOPHER? ASSAYING HEIDEGGER'S TAKING IN PLATO'S SOPHIST

Pages

  93-120

Keywords

PHILOSOPHER (DIALOGUE?)Q2

Abstract

 In the openings of Sophist and Statesman, PLATO does reportedly promise the reader that he intends to write a trilogy respectively entitled Sophist, Statesman and Philosopher. The two former dialogues have been authored and are available today, but this is not the case with the third dialogue; that is, PLATO never writes the third dialogue, or as said differently, he does not pen it like the other two ones. There are different views concerning this third dialogue. This essay is a critical appraisal of HEIDEGGER’s taking on this issue. HEIDEGGER does not accept the common view among the interpreters that PLATO has had the intention to write the triple dialogues and accordingly he seeks to retrieve the depiction of philosopher through PLATO’s corpus. He believes that PLATO has written the Philosopher but not in the form of other dialogues or rather in a Socratic fashion. This essay seeks to demonstrate that firstly, PLATO does not meet his promise as regarding to the composition of Philosopher; secondly, the reason for not keeping his promise is that PLATO believed basic philosophical themes could not be presented in written form, and that there is no benefit for the public in having them inscribed; thirdly, his depiction of philosopher can well be retrieved from his works.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOOSAZADEH NALBAND, SEDIGHEH, & FATHI, HASSAN. (2014). THE SUBJECT OF THE SOPHIST: SOPHIST OR PHILOSOPHER? ASSAYING HEIDEGGER'S TAKING IN PLATO'S SOPHIST. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL MEDITATIONS, 4(12), 93-120. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157733/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOOSAZADEH NALBAND SEDIGHEH, FATHI HASSAN. THE SUBJECT OF THE SOPHIST: SOPHIST OR PHILOSOPHER? ASSAYING HEIDEGGER'S TAKING IN PLATO'S SOPHIST. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL MEDITATIONS[Internet]. 2014;4(12):93-120. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157733/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEDIGHEH MOOSAZADEH NALBAND, and HASSAN FATHI, “THE SUBJECT OF THE SOPHIST: SOPHIST OR PHILOSOPHER? ASSAYING HEIDEGGER'S TAKING IN PLATO'S SOPHIST,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL MEDITATIONS, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 93–120, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157733/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button