POLITENESS AND POWER: LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF DISAGREEMENT IN THESIS DEFENSE SESSIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI SEYED MOHAMMAD

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCHES IN LINGUISTICS Year:2010 | Volume:1 | Issue:1 Page(s): 79-100

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

927

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

POLITENESS AND POWER: LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF DISAGREEMENT IN THESIS DEFENSE SESSIONS

Author(s)

HOSSEINI SEYED MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

POLITENESSQ3

POWERQ2

DISAGREEMENTQ3

THESIS DEFENSE SESSIONQ3

PERSIANQ2

Abstract

Power has been identified as an important variable in linguistic theories of POLITENESS but the way it influences interaction is not always in line with the models’ predictions. In this research, linguistic markers of DISAGREEMENT have been studied in eight master’s THESIS DEFENSE SESSIONs in four departments. Tokens of DISAGREEMENT between participants with POWER differentials (professor-student, student-professor) and those with equal relative POWERs (professor-professor, student-student) were extracted and analyzed within the framework of Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory of POLITENESS. The results clearly point to the influence of relative POWER relations but not necessarily in the manner predicted by Brown and Levinson (1987) or Leech (1983). It is concluded that POWER is displayed and exerted in THESIS DEFENSE SESSIONs by interacting with other factors such as severity of the face-threat, status, specific requirements of the context and, probably, generational differences.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI, SEYED MOHAMMAD. (2010). POLITENESS AND POWER: LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF DISAGREEMENT IN THESIS DEFENSE SESSIONS. JOURNAL OF RESEARCHES IN LINGUISTICS, 1(1), 79-100. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/160372/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI SEYED MOHAMMAD. POLITENESS AND POWER: LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF DISAGREEMENT IN THESIS DEFENSE SESSIONS. JOURNAL OF RESEARCHES IN LINGUISTICS[Internet]. 2010;1(1):79-100. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/160372/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MOHAMMAD HOSSEINI, “POLITENESS AND POWER: LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF DISAGREEMENT IN THESIS DEFENSE SESSIONS,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCHES IN LINGUISTICS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 79–100, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/160372/en

Related Journal Papers