A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE AESTHETICS OF EQUIVOQUE IN PERSIAN AND ARABIC RHETORIC

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KARIMI FARD GHOLAM REZA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Comparative Literature Year:2013 | Volume:4 | Issue:8 Page(s): 227-255

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

908

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE AESTHETICS OF EQUIVOQUE IN PERSIAN AND ARABIC RHETORIC

Author(s)

KARIMI FARD GHOLAM REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EQUIVOQUEQ2

MIMESISQ2

RHETORIC IN ARABIC AND PERSIAN LITERATUREQ2

Abstract

EQUIVOQUE is considered as the worthiest and most artistic figures of speech. In EQUIVOQUE the speaker generates different levels of meaning through the expansion of meaning for a word. EQUIVOQUE is defined as using a word with two meanings andintending for the second far-fetched one while the listener supposes that the first and the clearmeaning should be noted. There are different types of EQUIVOQUE: solitary (abstract or single), disclosed, proportional, antagonism, complex, double inverse proliferation, and ….This study tries to investigate EQUIVOQUE and itscreation process in the different typesmentioned. The differences among classifications-from rhetorical point of view-in Arabic and Persian languages are studied as well.

Cites

No record.

References