STRUCTURE STANDARDIZATION, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING QUESTIONNAIRE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TORKAN H.; SOLTANI IRAJ; PALAHANG H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Year:2010 | Volume:16 | Issue:3 (62) Page(s): 231-238

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,674

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STRUCTURE STANDARDIZATION, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING QUESTIONNAIRE

Author(s)

TORKAN H. | SOLTANI IRAJ | PALAHANG H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

STANDARDIZATIONQ3

VALIDITYQ2

RELIABILITYQ2

SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEINGQ3

Abstract

Objectives: To design a short questionnaire on SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING and the assessment of its VALIDITY and RELIABILITY.Method: Using references, a set of questions was gathered and constructed, and was assessed in two phases. In the first phase, it was randomly administered to 70 Mobarake Steel Complex personnel in Isfahan, Iran, and in the second phase it was administered to 40 personnel who had referred to a counseling center subsequent to a diagnosis of depressive disorder and anxiety via interview-as well as 166 non-referred personnel in a random manner. Internal consistency, content VALIDITY, diagnostic VALIDITY, RELIABILITY, cut-off points, sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire and its measurement error were calculated using correlation, analysis of variance, independent t, discriminate analysis and factor analysis.Results: The results of factor analysis showed four sub-scales: vitality, life determination, neuroses, and stress-depression. Cronbach’s alpha for these four subscales was higher than 0.8. The difference between the normal and the patient group (p<0.0001) indicated the VALIDITY of the questionnaire. Cut-off point, sensitivity and specificity of this questionnaire were 1.9%, 67.5%, and 78% respectively.Conclusion: Considering its favorable psychometric features, this questionnaire could be used for research, diagnostic and treatment purposes.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TORKAN, H., SOLTANI, IRAJ, & PALAHANG, H.. (2010). STRUCTURE STANDARDIZATION, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING QUESTIONNAIRE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 16(3 (62)), 231-238. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/17069/en

Vancouver: Copy

TORKAN H., SOLTANI IRAJ, PALAHANG H.. STRUCTURE STANDARDIZATION, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING QUESTIONNAIRE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY[Internet]. 2010;16(3 (62)):231-238. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/17069/en

IEEE: Copy

H. TORKAN, IRAJ SOLTANI, and H. PALAHANG, “STRUCTURE STANDARDIZATION, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING QUESTIONNAIRE,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 16, no. 3 (62), pp. 231–238, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/17069/en

Related Journal Papers