مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

938
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CULTURE AND SEROLOGICAL METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS

Pages

  37-42

Abstract

 Introduction & Objective: BRUCELLOSIS is a zoonosis with worldwide distribution. Conventional methods for DIAGNOSIS of BRUCELLOSIS include serologic tests and blood CULTURE. The aim of this study was to compare the CULTURE of clinical specimens and serologic test for the DIAGNOSIS of BRUCELLOSIS.Materials & Methods: In a 15-month period, all patients with clinical suspected BRUCELLOSIS were enrolled in this comparative-descriptive study. Blood specimens for all patients were obtained for CULTURE and serologic tests including wright, coombs' wright and 2ME. A questionnaire including demographic, clinical and paraclinical characteristics was completed for each subject.Results: A total of 149 patients were enrolled in the study. The most common symptoms were fever, malaise, myalgia and sweating. Osteoarticular complications were observed in 106 (71.1 %) patients, of which, the most common type was sacroiliitis in 67 patients (45%). The results of serologic tests including wright, coombs’ wright, and 2ME were positive in 88.6%, 87.5% and 88.5% of the patients. Also, CULTURE of clinical specimens were positive in 38.3% of the patients, of which, SEROLOGY was positive in 91.2% of the patients.Conclusion: Serologic tests are useful for the DIAGNOSIS of BRUCELLOSIS in most cases. CULTURE of blood and the clinical specimens are useful for definitive DIAGNOSIS even in patients with low titers of antibodies.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HASHEMI, S.H., TORKAMAN ASADI, F., ALIKHANI, M.Y., & NASERI, Z.. (2015). COMPARISON OF CULTURE AND SEROLOGICAL METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), 22(1 (SN 75)), 37-42. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/17328/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HASHEMI S.H., TORKAMAN ASADI F., ALIKHANI M.Y., NASERI Z.. COMPARISON OF CULTURE AND SEROLOGICAL METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES)[Internet]. 2015;22(1 (SN 75)):37-42. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/17328/en

    IEEE: Copy

    S.H. HASHEMI, F. TORKAMAN ASADI, M.Y. ALIKHANI, and Z. NASERI, “COMPARISON OF CULTURE AND SEROLOGICAL METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS,” AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), vol. 22, no. 1 (SN 75), pp. 37–42, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/17328/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button