مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

617
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPRISON OF THE ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSORS BY STUDENTS BASED ON TWO DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS, ASADABAD MEDICAL SCIENCES FACULTY, HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Pages

  209-214

Abstract

 Aims: The process of evaluating the professors by the STUDENTS, as a common method of evaluating, has many strengths and weaknesses in performance. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the stability of the evaluation of the professors by STUDENTS using two different protocols.Instrument & Methods: In this interventional study in Asadabad Medical Sciences School in 2013-2014, 174 STUDENTS assessed 26 professors in 53 courses at two semesters using two different methods; paper-based at one week before the end of semester (protocol A) and computer-based on the currently methods (protocol B) after the final exam. The questionnaire was the pre-defined tool in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 20 and Excel 2013 software with paired T, independent T and Pearson correlation coefficient tests.Findings: The mean score of assessments in protocol A (68.99±17.73) was significantly less than the mean score of assessments in protocol B (91.78±5.40; p<0.001). In all questions, the correlation between scores in two different executive protocol was statistically significant (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the mean scores given by STUDENTS according to different courses in two different protocols (p>0.05).Conclusion: Paper-based assessment of professors by STUDENTS one week before the end of semester is better than the computer-based method and it can discriminate the professors better.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    FARADMAL, J., ASGARI, GH., SHIRI, H., FAGHFOURIAN, H., & SEIDMOHAMMADI, A.. (2015). COMPRISON OF THE ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSORS BY STUDENTS BASED ON TWO DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS, ASADABAD MEDICAL SCIENCES FACULTY, HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES, 8(4 ), 209-214. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/174152/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    FARADMAL J., ASGARI GH., SHIRI H., FAGHFOURIAN H., SEIDMOHAMMADI A.. COMPRISON OF THE ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSORS BY STUDENTS BASED ON TWO DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS, ASADABAD MEDICAL SCIENCES FACULTY, HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES[Internet]. 2015;8(4 ):209-214. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/174152/en

    IEEE: Copy

    J. FARADMAL, GH. ASGARI, H. SHIRI, H. FAGHFOURIAN, and A. SEIDMOHAMMADI, “COMPRISON OF THE ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSORS BY STUDENTS BASED ON TWO DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS, ASADABAD MEDICAL SCIENCES FACULTY, HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,” EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES, vol. 8, no. 4 , pp. 209–214, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/174152/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button