مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,105
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFFS’ VIEWPOINT ABOUT THEIR ASSESSMENT BY STUDENTS IN HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (2011-2012)

Pages

  39-45

Abstract

 Introduction: Planning educational activities and modifying educational system are carried out in terms of assessment of lecturers. The goal of this study was to determine FACULTY MEMBERS’ viewpoints regarding teacher EVALUATION process by STUDENTS in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.Methods: This is a descriptive analytic and cross sectional study. Sampling method is based on census. It was performed in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences during 2011-2012. The data collection tool was a questionnaire which asked FACULTY MEMBERS’ viewpoints about EVALUATION process. The data was analyzed SPSS software using ANOVA, Chi 2 test and t-test.Results: Most lecturers believe that assessment is effective to improve their teaching (68.8%). But the most negative opinions were about lack of attention to the content differences of the courses with the same EVALUATION (90.6%) and Lack of showing educational skills by lecturers (79%). The result of EVALUATION was accepted by only 34.3% of academic staffs. There was not significant relationship among Viewpoints of FACULTY MEMBERS by consiering age (0.507), gender (0.941) and work experience (0.744).Conclusion: FACULTY MEMBERS were not so satisfied with the performance of EVALUATION process by STUDENTS and have negative attitude toward this issue. Therefore it is suggested that some explanatory workshops are held to inform lectures about and its effect onnstruction, also, implementing other EVALUATION method.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    JAMSHIDI, SH., BAGHAEI, F., ABDOLSAMADI, H.R., FARADMAL, J., SOLTANIAN, A.R., & AHMADIANI, E.. (2014). EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFFS’ VIEWPOINT ABOUT THEIR ASSESSMENT BY STUDENTS IN HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (2011-2012). RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, 5(2), 39-45. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/244534/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    JAMSHIDI SH., BAGHAEI F., ABDOLSAMADI H.R., FARADMAL J., SOLTANIAN A.R., AHMADIANI E.. EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFFS’ VIEWPOINT ABOUT THEIR ASSESSMENT BY STUDENTS IN HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (2011-2012). RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2014;5(2):39-45. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/244534/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SH. JAMSHIDI, F. BAGHAEI, H.R. ABDOLSAMADI, J. FARADMAL, A.R. SOLTANIAN, and E. AHMADIANI, “EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC STAFFS’ VIEWPOINT ABOUT THEIR ASSESSMENT BY STUDENTS IN HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (2011-2012),” RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 39–45, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/244534/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    مرکز اطلاعات علمی SID
    strs
    دانشگاه امام حسین
    بنیاد ملی بازیهای رایانه ای
    کلید پژوه
    ایران سرچ
    ایران سرچ
    File Not Exists.
    Move to top