COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ENDOSCOPIC AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS IN GASTRIC LESIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MORADI V.; JAMALI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine Year:2000 | Volume:7 | Issue:1 (SN 15) Page(s): 38-41

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,640

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ENDOSCOPIC AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS IN GASTRIC LESIONS

Author(s)

MORADI V. | JAMALI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ENDOSCOPYQ4

STOMATCH NEOPLASMS-DIAGNOSISQ4

STOMATCH NEOPLASMS-PATHOLOGYQ4

Abstract

This survey was carried out in order to evaluate the endoscopic results of gastric lesions in the base of pathologic diagnosis. 950 patients were studied in Imam Khomeini Hospital (Tehran) in 1990. The results showed that the gastric malignancies in this population included: 93.4% adeno - carcinoma, 6% squamous-cell-carcinoma, 0.6% lymphoma. The gastric benign included: 72.7% gastritis and 21.6% ulcer. 78% of malignant lesions were in male and 22% were in female. The most of the malignant lesions were in farmers. The sensitivity of ENDOSCOPY in diagnosis of malignant lesions was 81% and its specificity in diagnosis of benign lesions was 89%.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MORADI, V., & JAMALI, M.. (2000). COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ENDOSCOPIC AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS IN GASTRIC LESIONS. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), 7(1 (SN 15)), 38-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/18019/en

Vancouver: Copy

MORADI V., JAMALI M.. COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ENDOSCOPIC AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS IN GASTRIC LESIONS. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES)[Internet]. 2000;7(1 (SN 15)):38-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/18019/en

IEEE: Copy

V. MORADI, and M. JAMALI, “COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ENDOSCOPIC AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS IN GASTRIC LESIONS,” AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), vol. 7, no. 1 (SN 15), pp. 38–41, 2000, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/18019/en

Related Journal Papers