CRITICIZING GRONINGEN PROTOCOL IN SUPPORT OF EUTHANASIA FOR DISABLED NEWBORNS FROM A MORAL PERSPECTIVE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

PEYMAN A.; ABBASI Z.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Medical Ethics Year:2012 | Volume:5 | Issue:18 Page(s): 35-53

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

808

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITICIZING GRONINGEN PROTOCOL IN SUPPORT OF EUTHANASIA FOR DISABLED NEWBORNS FROM A MORAL PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

PEYMAN A. | ABBASI Z. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NEWBORNQ4

EUTHANASIAQ3

SEDATIVE TREATMENTQ4

ETHICSQ3

PAINQ3

Abstract

Today, despite the scientific improvements in the field of neonatal care in the world due to encountering with some awful medical situations many NEWBORNs are still suffering from very bad conditions for survival. Some Health-care providers and even some parents believe that the best choice for helping them is terminating their lives.Perhaps the heavy costs of neonatal intensive care wards, parental duties in comparison with other parents or the pity of parents for infants which cannot tolerate PAIN, determines their decisions.One of the topics that were considered by opponents of EUTHANASIA is slippery slope theory; which means whatever that is provided seen by legal resolutions in modern countries. In the Netherlands in 1980 and 1990, EUTHANASIA was widely discussed and in 2001, killing a patient by a doctor for getting rid of incurable PAINs was approved.Nowadays, there are valid documents indicating that at present in countries such as Holland, USA, UK and Australia providing that some physicians are being trained for voluntary EUTHANASIA and some of the professors have accepted that the involuntary EUTHANASIA for babies is a necessary action to help humanity.While in the present era all the religions have clearly expressed their disagreement with, EUTHANASIA the question is that how the humans who claim for the human ETHICS and rights, in last few decades have descended from legalization abortion to the EUTHANASIA of disabled children and neonatal and try to defend the NEWBORNs EUTHANASIA by approving the Groningen protocol? This paper deals with the eroticization and discussion of the protocol by relying on the reliable books and papers of the world. So it’s better to train neonatologist and supporting poor families instead of EUTHANASIA.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

PEYMAN, A., & ABBASI, Z.. (2012). CRITICIZING GRONINGEN PROTOCOL IN SUPPORT OF EUTHANASIA FOR DISABLED NEWBORNS FROM A MORAL PERSPECTIVE. MEDICAL ETHICS, 5(18), 35-53. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/195682/en

Vancouver: Copy

PEYMAN A., ABBASI Z.. CRITICIZING GRONINGEN PROTOCOL IN SUPPORT OF EUTHANASIA FOR DISABLED NEWBORNS FROM A MORAL PERSPECTIVE. MEDICAL ETHICS[Internet]. 2012;5(18):35-53. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/195682/en

IEEE: Copy

A. PEYMAN, and Z. ABBASI, “CRITICIZING GRONINGEN PROTOCOL IN SUPPORT OF EUTHANASIA FOR DISABLED NEWBORNS FROM A MORAL PERSPECTIVE,” MEDICAL ETHICS, vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 35–53, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/195682/en

Related Journal Papers