THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JEFF JORDAN’S VIEW ON RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND ITS NATURALISTIC EXPLANATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NASIRI MANSOUR

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2016 | Volume:48 | Issue:2 Page(s): 287-307

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

811

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JEFF JORDAN’S VIEW ON RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND ITS NATURALISTIC EXPLANATION

Author(s)

NASIRI MANSOUR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCEQ2

NATURALISTIC EXPLANATION OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCEQ2

JEFF JORDANQ2

RICHARD SWINBURNEQ2

Abstract

If we discover an adequate naturalistic explanation for RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE, will it diminish its evidentiary value? In response to this question, many thinkers such as C.D. Broad, RICHARD SWINBURNE and William Wainwright argue that an adequate naturalistic explanation cannot diminish RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE evidentiary value unless it can be demonstrated that there is no God. In contrary to this, some such as JEFF JORDAN insisted that the discovery of such explanation results in diminishing of its evidentiary value even though it cannot be demonstrated that there is no God. In this article, having examined the two views, I suggest a third one, according to which, there are two kinds of RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCEs, according to one, the RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE has evidentiary value even though it can be explained naturalistically too.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

NASIRI, MANSOUR. (2016). THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JEFF JORDAN’S VIEW ON RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND ITS NATURALISTIC EXPLANATION. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 48(2), 287-307. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198344/en

Vancouver: Copy

NASIRI MANSOUR. THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JEFF JORDAN’S VIEW ON RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND ITS NATURALISTIC EXPLANATION. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2016;48(2):287-307. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198344/en

IEEE: Copy

MANSOUR NASIRI, “THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JEFF JORDAN’S VIEW ON RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND ITS NATURALISTIC EXPLANATION,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 287–307, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198344/en

Related Journal Papers