EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS QUALITY TREND AS STRUCTURE AND TAXONOMY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMOUEI ABDOLIMAN; BARARI REYHANEH; NAGHIPOUR DARIUSH; MORTAZAVI YOUSEF; HOSSEINI SEYED REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Future of Medical Education Journal Year:2014 | Volume:4 | Issue:3 Page(s): 26-30

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

5,512

Download:

298

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS QUALITY TREND AS STRUCTURE AND TAXONOMY

Author(s)

Keywords

MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONSQ2

STRUCTUREQ2

KNOWLEDGE LEVEL DISTRIBUTIONQ2

PARA MEDICAL FACULTYQ2

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS is a strategic activity and the most effective tool in educational system and improvement. In this study, the quality of some indexes of multiple-choice exams in Babol PARA MEDICAL FACULTY was investigated on the basis of STRUCTURE and KNOWLEDGE LEVEL DISTRIBUTION in the first semesters of 2007 and 2012.Methods: The Milman checklist was used for evaluating the STRUCTURE quality of these questions. And these questions were also evaluated in terms of knowledge level in 3 taxonomies: 1. Reminding, 2. Perception and 3. Applying. Data analysis was performed by SPSS 16.Results: More than 70% of these multiple-choice pre-tests contained structural flaws, while the errors decreased from 70% to 30% in post-test and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.05). 83.9% and 79.5 % of these questions were located at taxonomy 1 in pre and post-tests, respectively.Conclusion: The result showed that the structural quality of these questions had desirable improvement, but there was no significant difference in taxonomy shifts- from 1 to 2, and 3- in terms of KNOWLEDGE LEVEL DISTRIBUTION. Therefore, it is necessary to hold workshops in order to improve the quality of MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS in terms of KNOWLEDGE LEVEL DISTRIBUTION at University.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AMOUEI, ABDOLIMAN, BARARI, REYHANEH, NAGHIPOUR, DARIUSH, MORTAZAVI, YOUSEF, & HOSSEINI, SEYED REZA. (2014). EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS QUALITY TREND AS STRUCTURE AND TAXONOMY. FUTURE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION JOURNAL, 4(3), 26-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/199947/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMOUEI ABDOLIMAN, BARARI REYHANEH, NAGHIPOUR DARIUSH, MORTAZAVI YOUSEF, HOSSEINI SEYED REZA. EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS QUALITY TREND AS STRUCTURE AND TAXONOMY. FUTURE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION JOURNAL[Internet]. 2014;4(3):26-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/199947/en

IEEE: Copy

ABDOLIMAN AMOUEI, REYHANEH BARARI, DARIUSH NAGHIPOUR, YOUSEF MORTAZAVI, and SEYED REZA HOSSEINI, “EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS QUALITY TREND AS STRUCTURE AND TAXONOMY,” FUTURE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION JOURNAL, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 26–30, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/199947/en

Related Journal Papers