COMPARISON BETWEEN STUDENT EVALUATION AND FACULTY SELF-EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL PERFORMANCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAHDAVI S.; ZARE S.; NAEIMI N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Research in Medical Education Year:2015 | Volume:6 | Issue:2 Page(s): 51-58

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

906

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN STUDENT EVALUATION AND FACULTY SELF-EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL PERFORMANCE

Author(s)

MAHDAVI S. | ZARE S. | NAEIMI N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

STUDENTQ2

EVALUATIONQ2

FACULTY MEMBERQ2

Abstract

Introduction: The EVALUATION of faculty teaching performance is often the most important factors in promotion and tenure decision at colleges and universities focused on teaching. The aim of this study was to compare STUDENTs’ EVALUATION of teaching and FACULTY MEMBERs’ self-evaluation for improving teaching Methods: This descriptive cross- sectional study was in health and nutrition school and 31 FACULTY MEMBERs selected through census sampling method and 310 STUDENTs who were selected randomly were participated in the study. Each of FACULTY MEMBERs was evaluated by 10 STUDENTs. The data gathering tool was two same questionnaires with point Likert scale and consisted teaching and demographic questions. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of FACULTY MEMBERs’ questionnaire was 0.87, STUDENTs’ questionnaire was 0.81, which shows the questionnaires’ reliability. The data were analyzed by independent t-tests in SPSS-16.Results: The total mean and standard deviation of the FACULTY MEMBERs’ self-evaluation scores was 40.82±7.52 and the total mean and standard deviation of Faculty teaching EVALUATION scores by STUDENTs was 40.07±4.13 findings show that the total mean scores of self-evaluation for FACULTY MEMBERs was higher than the total mean scores of EVALUATION by STUDENTs but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.38).Conclusion: To promote FACULTY MEMBERs’ instructional performance, FACULTY MEMBER self-evaluations, in addition to STUDENT EVALUATION of faculty teaching effectiveness, have been recommended as a more holistic approach.

Cites

SELF-ASSESSMENT OF SENIOR DENTAL STUDENTS ABOUT ACQUIRED SKILLS BASED ON THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAHDAVI, S., ZARE, S., & NAEIMI, N.. (2015). COMPARISON BETWEEN STUDENT EVALUATION AND FACULTY SELF-EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL PERFORMANCE. RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, 6(2), 51-58. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/244550/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAHDAVI S., ZARE S., NAEIMI N.. COMPARISON BETWEEN STUDENT EVALUATION AND FACULTY SELF-EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL PERFORMANCE. RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2015;6(2):51-58. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/244550/en

IEEE: Copy

S. MAHDAVI, S. ZARE, and N. NAEIMI, “COMPARISON BETWEEN STUDENT EVALUATION AND FACULTY SELF-EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL PERFORMANCE,” RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 51–58, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/244550/en

Related Journal Papers