A COMPARISON OF ACTIVE MEMORY PERFORMANCE AND SUSTAINED ATTENTION AMONG STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT LEARNING DISABILITIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KASAEIAN K.; KIAMANESH A.; BAHRAMI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES Year:2014 | Volume:3 | Issue:4 Page(s): 112-123

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,241

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF ACTIVE MEMORY PERFORMANCE AND SUSTAINED ATTENTION AMONG STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT LEARNING DISABILITIES

Author(s)

KASAEIAN K. | KIAMANESH A. | BAHRAMI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

WORKING MEMORYQ1

SUSTAINED ATTENTIONQ2

LEARNING DISABILITIESQ2

CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE TESTQ2

N-BACK TESTQ2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to comparethe performance of WORKING MEMORY and SUSTAINED ATTENTIONin LEARNING DISABILITIES and normal elementary course students in Tehran. The study has used a comparative method. Sixty students (20 persons with reading-writing disability, 20 persons with mathematical disability from learning special disabilities centres and 20 normal students) were selected through simple random sampling. N-BACK TEST for assessment of WORKING MEMORY and CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE TEST for assessment of SUSTAINED ATTENTION were performed. The one way ANOVA, KWANOVA and Tukey tests were used to analyse the data. The results showed that students with reading-writing disability are more impaired in performance of WORKING MEMORY and SUSTAINED ATTENTION in comparison with normal andmathematical disability groups. As a result, students with reading-writing disability showed weaknessin CPT and Nback tests.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KASAEIAN, K., KIAMANESH, A., & BAHRAMI, H.. (2014). A COMPARISON OF ACTIVE MEMORY PERFORMANCE AND SUSTAINED ATTENTION AMONG STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT LEARNING DISABILITIES. JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 3(4), 112-123. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/210149/en

Vancouver: Copy

KASAEIAN K., KIAMANESH A., BAHRAMI H.. A COMPARISON OF ACTIVE MEMORY PERFORMANCE AND SUSTAINED ATTENTION AMONG STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT LEARNING DISABILITIES. JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES[Internet]. 2014;3(4):112-123. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/210149/en

IEEE: Copy

K. KASAEIAN, A. KIAMANESH, and H. BAHRAMI, “A COMPARISON OF ACTIVE MEMORY PERFORMANCE AND SUSTAINED ATTENTION AMONG STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT LEARNING DISABILITIES,” JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 112–123, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/210149/en

Related Journal Papers