RETENTION OF CREATIVE PIN PLACEMENT VS. TRADITIONAL METHOD IN HUMAN MANDIBULAR MOLAR TEETH (IN VITRO)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

REZVANI M.B.; MOHAMMADI BASIR M.; MORADI Z.; MOLLAVERDI F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental School Year:2012 | Volume:29 | Issue:4 (90) Page(s): 268-273

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,146

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RETENTION OF CREATIVE PIN PLACEMENT VS. TRADITIONAL METHOD IN HUMAN MANDIBULAR MOLAR TEETH (IN VITRO)

Author(s)

REZVANI M.B. | MOHAMMADI BASIR M. | MORADI Z. | MOLLAVERDI F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMPOSITEQ2

DENTAL PINQ3

RETENTION OF RESTORATIONQ2

Abstract

Background and Aim: Extensive caries restoration has always been considered as one of dental issues. To resolve this problem different methods have been suggested such as dentinal pins. Previous clinical studies revealed that the use of retentive pins, faces numerous risks (pulp exposure, dentin cracks, root perforations, etc). Introducing of bonding and COMPOSITE systems, resulted in minimized mechanical retention for cavity preparation. Advantages of amalgam restorations such as simplicity of use, better mechanical properties, suitable clinical longevity and being less costly sustained its use in practice. On the other hand, caries removal usually results in a cavity form with small undercuts. So if we fill these small undercuts with “Bonding & COMPOSITE”, then insertion of pins in this base could be considered as a safe way for obtaining retention. The purpose of this study was comparing the retention of creative pin placement (using COMPOSITE) to the retention of traditional method.Materials & Methods: In this experimental study thirty sound human mandibular molar teeth free from decay and restoration were selected. The occlusal surface of samples was removed up to 3 mm above CEJ. Teeth were divided in 2 groups: Group A: (N=15) T.M.S. Minim pin inserted in dentin at 2 mm depth.Group B: (N=15) One layer of COMPOSITE (1 mm) bond to flat occlusal surface of teeth and then the pin was inserted in it at 2 mm depth so only 1mm of pin placed into dentin.Group C: (N=15) cylinders of COMPOSITE were prepared (height=5 mm, dimension=8 mm) and pin was inserted in them at 2 mm depth. The retention of pins was determined under tensile force with Zwick universal testing machine and data was charted by Test Xpert. 10-11 program.Results: Data were analyzed by variance analysis (ANOVA) and L.S.D. test. The ANOVA showed: a statistically significant difference between all groups. (P£0.05) The L.S.D. test showed:- No significant difference between A and B. (p>0.05) - Significant difference between A, B and C (p<0.05).Conclusion: The highest tensile strength belonged to group A. there was no significant difference between group A & B. So by using this technique 1mm depth of pin in dentin can result as same retention as 2 mm depth. The lowest tensile strength belonged to group C.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

REZVANI, M.B., MOHAMMADI BASIR, M., MORADI, Z., & MOLLAVERDI, F.. (2012). RETENTION OF CREATIVE PIN PLACEMENT VS. TRADITIONAL METHOD IN HUMAN MANDIBULAR MOLAR TEETH (IN VITRO). JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 29(4 (90)), 268-273. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/21622/en

Vancouver: Copy

REZVANI M.B., MOHAMMADI BASIR M., MORADI Z., MOLLAVERDI F.. RETENTION OF CREATIVE PIN PLACEMENT VS. TRADITIONAL METHOD IN HUMAN MANDIBULAR MOLAR TEETH (IN VITRO). JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2012;29(4 (90)):268-273. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/21622/en

IEEE: Copy

M.B. REZVANI, M. MOHAMMADI BASIR, Z. MORADI, and F. MOLLAVERDI, “RETENTION OF CREATIVE PIN PLACEMENT VS. TRADITIONAL METHOD IN HUMAN MANDIBULAR MOLAR TEETH (IN VITRO),” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 29, no. 4 (90), pp. 268–273, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/21622/en

Related Journal Papers