EVALUATION STUDY OF THE RETENTIVE CAPACITY OF TWO PREFABRICATED ENDODONTIC POSTS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT LUTING CEMENTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOGHADAS M.J.; AKBARI MAJID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Mashhad Dental School Year:2008 | Volume:32 | Issue:3 (66) Page(s): 237-242

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

850

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION STUDY OF THE RETENTIVE CAPACITY OF TWO PREFABRICATED ENDODONTIC POSTS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT LUTING CEMENTS

Author(s)

MOGHADAS M.J. | AKBARI MAJID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DENTAL PINSQ3

DENTAL CEMENTSQ2

RETENTIONQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Prefabricated endodontic post is one of the most effective factors to increase RETENTION in severely destroyed teeth restorations. The RETENTION is related to the post and cement. The aim of this study was to compare the retentive capacity of two prefabricated endodontic posts comented with two different luting cements.Materials & Methods: In this parallel experimental in vitro study, 32 intact similar single root premolars were divided into two equal groups. The teeth were cut at CEJ and received endodontic treatment. The post spaces were prepared with pisoreamer drills. In the first group, Dentatus posts were cemented with zinc phosphate in eight teeth and the remainder was cemented with glass ionomer. In the other group para posts were cemented in two subgroups the same as Dentatus posts. After mounting all specimens in acrylic resin blocks the RETENTION of each post was measured with Instron testing machine and the data were analyzed with student t-test (¥=0.05).Results: The mean RETENTION value of the para post group was higher than the other one (P<0.001). But there was no significant difference between two cements (P=0.11). The RETENTION values for zinc phosphate cement was higher in para post group (P<0.001) but in Dentatus group there was no difference between subgroups (P=0.64).Conclusion: The RETENTION capacity was higher with para post in comparison with Dentatus. Zinc phosphate showed higher RETENTION with para post but there was no difference between zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cement in RETENTION of Dentatust post.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOGHADAS, M.J., & AKBARI, MAJID. (2008). EVALUATION STUDY OF THE RETENTIVE CAPACITY OF TWO PREFABRICATED ENDODONTIC POSTS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT LUTING CEMENTS. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, 32(3 (66)), 237-242. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/74330/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOGHADAS M.J., AKBARI MAJID. EVALUATION STUDY OF THE RETENTIVE CAPACITY OF TWO PREFABRICATED ENDODONTIC POSTS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT LUTING CEMENTS. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2008;32(3 (66)):237-242. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/74330/en

IEEE: Copy

M.J. MOGHADAS, and MAJID AKBARI, “EVALUATION STUDY OF THE RETENTIVE CAPACITY OF TWO PREFABRICATED ENDODONTIC POSTS CEMENTED WITH TWO DIFFERENT LUTING CEMENTS,” JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 32, no. 3 (66), pp. 237–242, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/74330/en

Related Journal Papers