CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF FERRIC SULFATE AND FORMOCRESOL PULPOTOMY TECHNIQUE IN PRIMARY TEETH

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HAGHGOU R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental School Year:2005 | Volume:23 | Issue:2 Page(s): 249-255

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

856

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF FERRIC SULFATE AND FORMOCRESOL PULPOTOMY TECHNIQUE IN PRIMARY TEETH

Author(s)

HAGHGOU R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PULPOTOMYQ3

FERRIC SULFATEQ4

FORMOCRESOLQ4

PRIMARY TEETHQ2

CLINICAL EVALUATIONQ4

RADIOGRAPHICQ4

EVALUATIONQ4

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and RADIOGRAPHIC effects of FORMOCRESOL (FC) to that of FERRIC SULFATE (FS) in pulpotomized primary molars with carious pulp exposure.Methods & Materials: This study was performed as sequential matched controlled double blind randomized clinical trial. Sixty teeth of 30 children age 3- 6 years old were treated by a conventional PULPOTOMY technique. The identical teeth on two sides were randomly assigned to FC or FS. In the control group FC and in the experimental group FS was placed. The clinical and RADIOGRAPHIC follow up was done at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The data was analyzed by chi - square test.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in successful clinical and radiological outcome between two groups.Conclusion: FERRIC SULFATE can be used versus FORMOCRESOL in PRIMARY TEETH PULPOTOMY.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HAGHGOU, R.. (2005). CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF FERRIC SULFATE AND FORMOCRESOL PULPOTOMY TECHNIQUE IN PRIMARY TEETH. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 23(2), 249-255. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/21689/en

Vancouver: Copy

HAGHGOU R.. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF FERRIC SULFATE AND FORMOCRESOL PULPOTOMY TECHNIQUE IN PRIMARY TEETH. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2005;23(2):249-255. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/21689/en

IEEE: Copy

R. HAGHGOU, “CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF FERRIC SULFATE AND FORMOCRESOL PULPOTOMY TECHNIQUE IN PRIMARY TEETH,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 249–255, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/21689/en

Related Journal Papers