Two Reports of a Historical Event: A Comparative Study of Taha Hossein's and Martin Hendes's Views toward the Murder of the Third Caliph

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SANAEI HAMIDREZA; MOJTAHEDI MAHDI

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THE HISTORY OF ISLAMIC CULTURE AND CIVILIZATION Year:2018 | Volume:9 | Issue:31 Page(s): 47-74

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

472

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Two Reports of a Historical Event: A Comparative Study of Taha Hossein's and Martin Hendes's Views toward the Murder of the Third Caliph

Author(s)

SANAEI HAMIDREZA | MOJTAHEDI MAHDI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Uthman ibn AffanQ1

Taha HosseinQ1

Martin HendesQ1

HistoriographyQ2

Abstract

Historiography of early Islam has not been immune from the influence of religious motives, and the difference between the various theological religions is often reflected in their views of the events and personalities of early Islam. Some religions gain their legitimacy from this kind of look. Attitudes toward the third Caliph, Uthman, and the cause of his murder have been the source of wide disagreement among the Muslims. Meanwhile, History scholars, in spite of the great influence of their interests, have been working on scientific methods to study the incidents related to his murder and have become close to the reality and objectivity to some extent. A comparative study of the two contemporary looks, i. e. Arabic and Western, in order to explain this issue, is the subject of this paper. Taha Hossien, an Egyptian historian and a literary scholar and Martin Hendes, a western scholar, have tried to explain the caliphate's murder event with impartiality. Putting these two views in a double-pan balance scale and comparing the purpose, the method of research, the resources, the strength of the analysis, and their views make a remarkable difference between the two views.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SANAEI, HAMIDREZA, & MOJTAHEDI, MAHDI. (2018). Two Reports of a Historical Event: A Comparative Study of Taha Hossein's and Martin Hendes's Views toward the Murder of the Third Caliph. THE HISTORY OF ISLAMIC CULTURE AND CIVILIZATION, 9(31 ), 47-74. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/225058/en

Vancouver: Copy

SANAEI HAMIDREZA, MOJTAHEDI MAHDI. Two Reports of a Historical Event: A Comparative Study of Taha Hossein's and Martin Hendes's Views toward the Murder of the Third Caliph. THE HISTORY OF ISLAMIC CULTURE AND CIVILIZATION[Internet]. 2018;9(31 ):47-74. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/225058/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMIDREZA SANAEI, and MAHDI MOJTAHEDI, “Two Reports of a Historical Event: A Comparative Study of Taha Hossein's and Martin Hendes's Views toward the Murder of the Third Caliph,” THE HISTORY OF ISLAMIC CULTURE AND CIVILIZATION, vol. 9, no. 31 , pp. 47–74, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/225058/en

Related Journal Papers