مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

823
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF INHALED METHOXYFLURANE AND INJECTION OF MORPHINE/PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF OPERATIONAL INJURED PATIENTS

Pages

  42-45

Abstract

 Background: Pain among patients is prevalent and often remains untreated. On the other hand, given that military medicine is one of the main tasks of the Armed Forces Health, pain relief for battlefield wounded soldiers with non-narcotic medications or replacing the current narcotics with an effective non-addictive drug is necessary. The aim of this study was todetermine the effect of inhaled METHOXYFLURANE (PenthroxÒ) on pain control of injured patients and comparison it with injection of pethidine/morphine.Materials and methods: In this experimental study, 71 wounded patients were included who were admitted to Nezaja hospitals in Tehran in 2009. To compare the effectiveness of medications standard pain scale (McGill) was used. Descriptive and comparison analyses were performed for data analysis.Results: Totally, pain was treated with pethidine/morphine and penthroxÒ with in 41 and 30 patients, respectively. The results strongly indicate that penthroxÒ can easily be used for conscious injured battlefield patients without significant complications, but it had no a great help for their pain relief. In contrast, pethidine/morphine significantly reduced the pain of wounded patients.Conclusion: PenthroxÒ may not be an alternative to pethidine/morphine for pain relief among battlefield Wounded soldiers.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NAJAFIPOUR, F., REZVANFAR, M.A., & ZAREIY, S.. (2014). COMPARISON OF INHALED METHOXYFLURANE AND INJECTION OF MORPHINE/PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF OPERATIONAL INJURED PATIENTS. EBNESINA, 15(4 (45)), 42-45. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/228582/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NAJAFIPOUR F., REZVANFAR M.A., ZAREIY S.. COMPARISON OF INHALED METHOXYFLURANE AND INJECTION OF MORPHINE/PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF OPERATIONAL INJURED PATIENTS. EBNESINA[Internet]. 2014;15(4 (45)):42-45. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/228582/en

    IEEE: Copy

    F. NAJAFIPOUR, M.A. REZVANFAR, and S. ZAREIY, “COMPARISON OF INHALED METHOXYFLURANE AND INJECTION OF MORPHINE/PETHIDINE FOR PAIN RELIEF OPERATIONAL INJURED PATIENTS,” EBNESINA, vol. 15, no. 4 (45), pp. 42–45, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/228582/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button