EVALUATION OF FIVE FREE MEDLINE VERSIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ERSHAD SARABI R.; ASADI GARKANI F.; ZOHOUR A.R.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Payesh Year:2002 | Volume:1 | Issue:3 Page(s): 65-68

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

3,392

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF FIVE FREE MEDLINE VERSIONS

Author(s)

ERSHAD SARABI R. | ASADI GARKANI F. | ZOHOUR A.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FREE MEDLINEQ4

RECALLQ4

PRECISIONQ4

NATURAL LANGUAGEQ4

STRUCTURAL LANGUAGEQ4

Abstract

Objective(s): To evaluation of five FREE MEDLINE versions, this study designed. Material & Methods: This research was a cross - sectional study in nature and conducted to evaluate the five famous Medline versions (BioMedNet, Dimidi, Infotrieve, Grateful Med and Pub med) that are available freely on the Internet. For this purpose 36 topics requested for searching at the information center of the university of Kerman medical sciences were searched in the title field. Results: The results were analyzed statistically by using paired t-test and repeated ANOVA. There was no significant difference in RECALL and PRECISION between under studied versions in both types of natural and STRUCTURAL LANGUAGE searching. But in each version there was a significant difference in RECALL and PRECISION between natural and STRUCTURAL LANGUAGE searching (P<0.05). Conclusion: Based on the results, NATURAL LANGUAGE searching has the higher rate of real and PRECISION compared to STRUCTURAL LANGUAGE searching.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ERSHAD SARABI, R., ASADI GARKANI, F., & ZOHOUR, A.R.. (2002). EVALUATION OF FIVE FREE MEDLINE VERSIONS. PAYESH, 1(3), 65-68. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/23343/en

Vancouver: Copy

ERSHAD SARABI R., ASADI GARKANI F., ZOHOUR A.R.. EVALUATION OF FIVE FREE MEDLINE VERSIONS. PAYESH[Internet]. 2002;1(3):65-68. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/23343/en

IEEE: Copy

R. ERSHAD SARABI, F. ASADI GARKANI, and A.R. ZOHOUR, “EVALUATION OF FIVE FREE MEDLINE VERSIONS,” PAYESH, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 65–68, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/23343/en

Related Journal Papers