COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BASIS OF EPISTEMOLOGY IN THEORY OF RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY UNDERLYING IMAM KHOMEINI’S AND JÜRGEN HABERMAS’S VIEWPOINT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SADATINEZHAD SAYYED MAHDI; SHIRAZI ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOSTARHA-YE SIYASI-YE MOASER Year:2016 | Volume:7 | Issue:3 Page(s): 1-26

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

726

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BASIS OF EPISTEMOLOGY IN THEORY OF RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY UNDERLYING IMAM KHOMEINI’S AND JÜRGEN HABERMAS’S VIEWPOINT

Author(s)

SADATINEZHAD SAYYED MAHDI | SHIRAZI ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACYQ2

DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACYQ2

EPISTEMOLOGYQ2

Abstract

Two governmental patterns, RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY (as the form of Islamic republic) and DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY are the new proposed patterns at the beyond of thought and political action, although their roots and history have been old. The comparative study as an old approach in social science while it’s applied between two theories could lead to solve the theoretical problem and conceptual ambiguities of those theories, and contributes to quantitative and qualitative expansion as a scientific method.Through this viewpoint, this article has tried to study the epistemological aspect of two mentioned theories as one of the cognition pillars of one theory. To reach this goal firstly the EPISTEMOLOGY position of one theory and then a brief explanation of those patterns should be stated, furthermore the segregation and similarities of the both theories will be compared in short.The most prominent beginning point of comparison which generally leads to segregation of two theories with regards to EPISTEMOLOGY, is monotheism in RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY and humanism in DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY.It has to be mentioned since the most distinctive persons in these two theories are Imam Khomeini and Jürgen Habermas in turn, this article has emphasized on their opinions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SADATINEZHAD, SAYYED MAHDI, & SHIRAZI, ALI. (2016). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BASIS OF EPISTEMOLOGY IN THEORY OF RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY UNDERLYING IMAM KHOMEINI’S AND JURGEN HABERMAS’S VIEWPOINT. JOSTARHA-YE SIYASI-YE MOASER, 7(3 ), 1-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/233522/en

Vancouver: Copy

SADATINEZHAD SAYYED MAHDI, SHIRAZI ALI. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BASIS OF EPISTEMOLOGY IN THEORY OF RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY UNDERLYING IMAM KHOMEINI’S AND JURGEN HABERMAS’S VIEWPOINT. JOSTARHA-YE SIYASI-YE MOASER[Internet]. 2016;7(3 ):1-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/233522/en

IEEE: Copy

SAYYED MAHDI SADATINEZHAD, and ALI SHIRAZI, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BASIS OF EPISTEMOLOGY IN THEORY OF RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY UNDERLYING IMAM KHOMEINI’S AND JURGEN HABERMAS’S VIEWPOINT,” JOSTARHA-YE SIYASI-YE MOASER, vol. 7, no. 3 , pp. 1–26, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/233522/en

Related Journal Papers