ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL ERRORS OF APPROVED RESEARCH PROJECTS IN DEPUTY OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAMANI ALIREZA; ZAMANIAN ABBAS; FALLAH MOHAMMAD; MAHJOUB HOSSEIN; AHMADKHANI ZHILA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PAJOUHAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL Year:2014 | Volume:13 | Issue:1 Page(s): 18-23

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,079

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL ERRORS OF APPROVED RESEARCH PROJECTS IN DEPUTY OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Author(s)

Keywords

APPROVED PROJECTSQ2

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY DEPUTY OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCESQ2

METHODOLOGICAL ERRORSQ2

Abstract

Introduction: This cross sectional study was conducted to assess METHODOLOGICAL ERRORS in proposals of 95 approved research projects introduced to different unites of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2007.Methods: We used a questionnaire able to determine the kind of studies, correct designing of aims, hypothesis, methods and considering ethical codes. SPSS version 16 was used to descriptive statistics analysis of the data.Results: %62.1 of the projects were epidemiological studies, %12.6 basic sciences, %9.5 clinical trials, %4.2 health research systems, %1.1 productive and %10.5 others. Statistical tests, statistical analysis and ethical codes in %63.2, %60 and %30.5 of the projects, respectively were not considered. The methods of the research were not written completely in %27.4 of the projects. The designing of the minor aims in %24.2 of the projects were also incorrect.Conclusion: Considering the most important part of a research is research design, thus, it is essential that a committee comprised of experts in statistics and research methods firstly verify the presented proposals to the Research Council of the university to reduce as much as possible the mentioned defects destroying research results. Moreover, Vice-Chancellor in research affairs of the university should be active more in holding workshops and setting up educational brochures than it used to be.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAMANI, ALIREZA, ZAMANIAN, ABBAS, FALLAH, MOHAMMAD, MAHJOUB, HOSSEIN, & AHMADKHANI, ZHILA. (2014). ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL ERRORS OF APPROVED RESEARCH PROJECTS IN DEPUTY OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. PAJOUHAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 13(1), 18-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/252963/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAMANI ALIREZA, ZAMANIAN ABBAS, FALLAH MOHAMMAD, MAHJOUB HOSSEIN, AHMADKHANI ZHILA. ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL ERRORS OF APPROVED RESEARCH PROJECTS IN DEPUTY OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. PAJOUHAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL[Internet]. 2014;13(1):18-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/252963/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIREZA ZAMANI, ABBAS ZAMANIAN, MOHAMMAD FALLAH, HOSSEIN MAHJOUB, and ZHILA AHMADKHANI, “ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL ERRORS OF APPROVED RESEARCH PROJECTS IN DEPUTY OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,” PAJOUHAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/252963/en

Related Journal Papers