COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE INHIBITION IN THREE GROUPS OF STUDENTS WITH HIGH, NORMAL AND LOW MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ADIBNIYA FAEZEE; KAKAVAND ALIREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN LEARNING Year:2018 | Volume:5 | Issue:9 Page(s): 103-116

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

957

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE INHIBITION IN THREE GROUPS OF STUDENTS WITH HIGH, NORMAL AND LOW MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT

Author(s)

ADIBNIYA FAEZEE | KAKAVAND ALIREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COGNITIVE INHIBITIONQ1

MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENTQ2

STUDENTSQ2

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare COGNITIVE INHIBITION in three groups of STUDENTS with high, normal and low achievement in mathematical.Method: This study was a causal-comparative study. The population of this study included all fifth grade STUDENTS in 1393-94 in Arak.33 STUDENTS with high MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT, 39 STUDENTS with normal MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT and 36 STUDENTS with low MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT were selected by convenience sampling method. To collect the data, Raven’s IQ test, Conners Teacher Rate Scale, researcher constructed mathematical test and numerical stroop test were used. For analyzing the data, multivariate analysis of variance and follow-up Scheffe tests were used.Results: The results of multivariate analysis showed that there was a significant difference between performance of three groups of STUDENTS in numerical stroop. Results of follow-up Scheffe test showed the interference score of numerical stroop effect and physical stroop effect in STUDENTS with normal MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT was higher than STUDENTS with high MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT and the interference score in STUDENTS with low MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT was higher than other groups.Conclusion: It can be concluded that STUDENTS with low MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT have the lowest performance in COGNITIVE INHIBITION.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ADIBNIYA, FAEZEE, & KAKAVAND, ALIREZA. (2018). COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE INHIBITION IN THREE GROUPS OF STUDENTS WITH HIGH, NORMAL AND LOW MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN LEARNING, 5(9 ), 103-116. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/255190/en

Vancouver: Copy

ADIBNIYA FAEZEE, KAKAVAND ALIREZA. COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE INHIBITION IN THREE GROUPS OF STUDENTS WITH HIGH, NORMAL AND LOW MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN LEARNING[Internet]. 2018;5(9 ):103-116. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/255190/en

IEEE: Copy

FAEZEE ADIBNIYA, and ALIREZA KAKAVAND, “COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE INHIBITION IN THREE GROUPS OF STUDENTS WITH HIGH, NORMAL AND LOW MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT,” JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN LEARNING, vol. 5, no. 9 , pp. 103–116, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/255190/en

Related Journal Papers