A CLINICAL EVALUATION ON ADHESIVE POSTS IN EXTENSIVE COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH; HOSSEINI SAA.; FARZANEH H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental Medicine Year:2003 | Volume:16 | Issue:1 (34) Page(s): 46-55

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

783

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CLINICAL EVALUATION ON ADHESIVE POSTS IN EXTENSIVE COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS

Author(s)

GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH | HOSSEINI SAA. | FARZANEH H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

POSTQ3

COMPOSITE RESTORATIONQ3

ANTERIOR TEETHQ4

PARA POSTQ4

Abstract

Statement of Problem: A few studies have been conducted about bioglass POSTs.Aim: The aim of this study was to compare bioglass POSTs with prefabricated metallic POSTs in clinical performance of extensive COMPOSITE RESTORATIONs for anterior endodontically treated teeth.Materials and Methods: Sixty endodontocally maxillary ANTERIOR TEETH, with horizontally or vertically destruction were selected. Teeth were divided into two groups based on the kind of POST: Metallic prefabricated paraPOST and bioglass POST. Each group was divided into three subgroups based on anterior bite: normal, deep bite and edge to edge. Gutta-percha was removed from 2/3 of canal length for paraPOST and 1/3 for bioglass POST. After etching with phosphoric-acid (37%) and applying dentine bonding Syntac, Duo cement was used for the adhesion of bioglass POST and a self cured composite (Degufil) for paraPOST. Restoration was done with a hybrid composite (Heliomolar). Follow up studies, radiographically and clinically, were done every three months for a 1.5-year period. Exact Fisher and Pearson tests were used for data analysis.Results: Apical lesion was not observed in any of the radiographs. POST seal was increased by resin cement and dentin bonding agent. POST type did not significantly affect on the clinical success rate of the restorations. The retention of restoration, for both POSTs, was the same. Crown destruction had no significant effect on success rate. The type of anterior bite had a significant effect on success rate, as the total 6.6% failure rate was related to the patients with anterior deep bite.Conclusion: It is suggested to use metallic paraPOSTs and bioglass POSTs, in extensive COMPOSITE RESTORATIONs for patients with deep-bite, more conservatively.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAVAM NASIRI, MARJANEH, HOSSEINI, SAA., & FARZANEH, H.. (2003). A CLINICAL EVALUATION ON ADHESIVE POSTS IN EXTENSIVE COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 16(1 (34)), 46-55. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25647/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH, HOSSEINI SAA., FARZANEH H.. A CLINICAL EVALUATION ON ADHESIVE POSTS IN EXTENSIVE COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2003;16(1 (34)):46-55. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25647/en

IEEE: Copy

MARJANEH GHAVAM NASIRI, SAA. HOSSEINI, and H. FARZANEH, “A CLINICAL EVALUATION ON ADHESIVE POSTS IN EXTENSIVE COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 16, no. 1 (34), pp. 46–55, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25647/en

Related Journal Papers