BURHAN-E SIDDIGIN IN MUUASADRA'S PHILOSOPHY IN COMPARISON WITH ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT OR ANSELM AND DESCARTES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AKBARIAN REZA; FAJR DEZFOULI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES (TABRIZ) Year:2008 | Volume:50 | Issue:202 Page(s): 17-58

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,993

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

BURHAN-E SIDDIGIN IN MUUASADRA'S PHILOSOPHY IN COMPARISON WITH ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT OR ANSELM AND DESCARTES

Author(s)

AKBARIAN REZA | FAJR DEZFOULI A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BURHAN-E SIDDIQINQ3

ONTOLOGOCALARGUMENTQ2

MULLA SADRAQ2

IBN SINAQ2

ANSELMQ2

DESCARTESQ2

Abstract

In the history of philosophy, BURHAN-E SIDDIQIN as a way for proving the God ftom God has singular position among proofs of God. This argument originates essentially from Holy Quran and Shi'ite Imams teachings. This Burhan prove primarily the existence of God by means of meditation on existence in itself and its essential properties. In this way, God is proved firstly and other existents are explained as consequences of His Existence. MULLA SADRA, ANSELM and DESCARTES explicate this argument in accordance with their principles. However from the view of Kant, the famous German philosopher, all of the proofs of existence of God is eventually refer to ontological (existential) argument and this argument has a basic error. According to Kant's viewpoint ontological argument suffer from a fundamental fallacy because it consider existence as a real predicate and strive to prove God by virtue of analyzing His concept. Therefore Kant criticizes ANSELM's and DESCARTES' ontological arguments and said that their arguments were not confident. In my view, Kant's critique of ontological argument is not involving MULLA SADRA's BURHAN-E SIDDIQIN and his Burhan has enough capability to demonstrate a certain intellectual way for proving the existence of God. The aim of this paper is to explain the MULLA SADRA's Burhan_eSiddiqin, compare it to ontological argument of ANSELMand DESCARTES and indicate that Kant criticism of existential argument is not involve MULLA SADRA's BURHAN-E SIDDIQIN.

Cites

HLA-DR TYPING BY PCR-SSP AND COMPARISON OF SEROLOGIC RESULTS WITH THIS METHOD

References

خدا در فلسفه ملاصدرا

Cite

APA: Copy

AKBARIAN, REZA, & FAJR DEZFOULI, A.. (2008). BURHAN-E SIDDIGIN IN MUUASADRA'S PHILOSOPHY IN COMPARISON WITH ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT OR ANSELM AND DESCARTES. JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES (TABRIZ), 50(202), 17-58. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25926/en

Vancouver: Copy

AKBARIAN REZA, FAJR DEZFOULI A.. BURHAN-E SIDDIGIN IN MUUASADRA'S PHILOSOPHY IN COMPARISON WITH ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT OR ANSELM AND DESCARTES. JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES (TABRIZ)[Internet]. 2008;50(202):17-58. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25926/en

IEEE: Copy

REZA AKBARIAN, and A. FAJR DEZFOULI, “BURHAN-E SIDDIGIN IN MUUASADRA'S PHILOSOPHY IN COMPARISON WITH ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT OR ANSELM AND DESCARTES,” JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES (TABRIZ), vol. 50, no. 202, pp. 17–58, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25926/en

Related Journal Papers