مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

718
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of Social Thinking in Allameh Tabataba'i and Lipman’ s Views and its Implications for Philosophy for Children (P4C)

Pages

  149-186

Abstract

 The purpose of this research was to compare and analyze views of Matthew Lipman, as the originator of P4C, and those of Allameh Tabataba'i on social thinking and to discover commonalities and differences between them in order to make the best use of P4C in the formal and public education system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The statistical population of the study comprised all works, documents and databases containing Allameh Tabataba'i and Lipman’ s views on social thinking. These sources were first identified and then studied purposefully and thoroughly. Next, the obtained data were analyzed through analytical-inferential-comparative methods and this was continuously and simultaneously carried out with data collection. The findings indicated that Lipman and Allameh Tabataba'i have similar perspectives on "attention to individuality while accepting social dignity", "belief in prominent position of thinking and rationality in social interactions", "focus on dialogues" and "rejection of moral relativism". Differences between these two thinkers include "placing great emphasis on method of enquiry by Lipman versus giving great importance to gaining knowledge by Allameh" and "dominance of thinking in Lipman’ s paradigm and faith in that of Allameh". The implications of this research are to strive for the promotion of a dialogue-based approach to education and to avoid impeding critical and free thinking.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MARASHI, SEYED MANSOUR, Cheraghian, Jafar, SAFAEI MOGHADDAM, MASOUD, & VALAVI, PARVANEH. (2018). A Comparative Study of Social Thinking in Allameh Tabataba'i and Lipman’ s Views and its Implications for Philosophy for Children (P4C). JOURNAL OF APPLIED ISSUES IN ISLAMIC EDUCATION, 3(1 (6) ), 149-186. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/261814/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MARASHI SEYED MANSOUR, Cheraghian Jafar, SAFAEI MOGHADDAM MASOUD, VALAVI PARVANEH. A Comparative Study of Social Thinking in Allameh Tabataba'i and Lipman’ s Views and its Implications for Philosophy for Children (P4C). JOURNAL OF APPLIED ISSUES IN ISLAMIC EDUCATION[Internet]. 2018;3(1 (6) ):149-186. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/261814/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEYED MANSOUR MARASHI, Jafar Cheraghian, MASOUD SAFAEI MOGHADDAM, and PARVANEH VALAVI, “A Comparative Study of Social Thinking in Allameh Tabataba'i and Lipman’ s Views and its Implications for Philosophy for Children (P4C),” JOURNAL OF APPLIED ISSUES IN ISLAMIC EDUCATION, vol. 3, no. 1 (6) , pp. 149–186, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/261814/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button