مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

587
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Introducing and Criticizing the Doctrine of Election of Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Study in American Law, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law of Iran

Pages

  173-200

Abstract

 In most of the legal systems, the non-breaching party has numerous ways to deal with the breach and its resulting compensation. An important question raised in this case is whether the non-breaching party can choose between the related Remedies and select the one which is more beneficial for him. There is a doctrine in American law, known as Doctrine of Election of Remedies, based on which a person not only can but is required to choose one of the available Remedies. According to this doctrine, election of a remedy can be final, binding and inalienable, even if, it does not supported by consideration or is not by deed, or even is not relied by the other part. Notwithstanding its precedent in American law, this doctrine has been criticized over the history. Contradictions with justice, differences in judicial procedures, principle of the accumulation of Remedies and their changeability as well as lack of independence are among the criticisms. As regards the Imamiyah jurisprudence and Iranian law, it should be stated that on one hand some of the results of the aforementioned doctrine are obtained by similar institutions and foundations, and accordingly there is no need for the doctrine. On the other hand, some of the other results of the doctrine are rejected by the Iranian law and are not acceptable.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Nematolahii, Esmaiil, & Dehghani Dehaj, Iman. (2018). Introducing and Criticizing the Doctrine of Election of Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Study in American Law, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law of Iran. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW, 5(3 (17) ), 173-200. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/262173/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Nematolahii Esmaiil, Dehghani Dehaj Iman. Introducing and Criticizing the Doctrine of Election of Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Study in American Law, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law of Iran. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW[Internet]. 2018;5(3 (17) ):173-200. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/262173/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Esmaiil Nematolahii, and Iman Dehghani Dehaj, “Introducing and Criticizing the Doctrine of Election of Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Study in American Law, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law of Iran,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW, vol. 5, no. 3 (17) , pp. 173–200, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/262173/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button