مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

275
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

167
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN PYELOPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION

Pages

  165-169

Abstract

 Purpose: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes, complications, and hospital stay in laparoscopic and open PYELOPLASTY. Materials and Methods: From February 2002 to February 2003, 69 patients with URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION obstruction (UPJO) were assigned into two groups. Thirty-seven patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic PYELOPLASTY and 32 underwent open surgical PYELOPLASTY. Clinical symptoms were assessed before and after surgery, subjectively. Radiological assessment was also done three months postoperatively. Results: Mean operative time was 3.2 hours and 2.2 hours in laparoscopic and open PYELOPLASTY groups, respectively. Intraoperative bleeding was trivial in both groups and no complication or conversion to open surgery occurred. Postoperative complication rates were 24% and 6%in laparoscopic and open PYELOPLASTY groups, respectively. Mean hospital stay was similar (6.2 days) in the two groups. Mean follow-upwas 16.5 months versus 11.4 months. Clinical and radiological success rates were 89% and 83.8% for LAPAROSCOPY group versus 96.5% and 87%for open PYELOPLASTY group. Due to recurrence of stricture, repeated surgery was performed in 4 patients of LAPAROSCOPY and 1 of open PYELOPLASTY groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic PYELOPLASTY is a less invasive method with less pain, cosmetic advantages, no long incision, and outcome comparable with open surgery. Hospital stay js also not longer than that jn open surgerjes. Hence, laparoscopjc PYELOPLASTY can be a substjtute for skilled surgeons.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SIMFOROOSH, N., BASIRI, A., TABIBI, A., DANESH, A.K., SHARIFI AGHDAS, F., ZIAEE, S., NOURALIZADEH, A., & HOSSEINI MOGHADAM, S.M.M.. (2004). A COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN PYELOPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 1(3), 165-169. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/270650/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SIMFOROOSH N., BASIRI A., TABIBI A., DANESH A.K., SHARIFI AGHDAS F., ZIAEE S., NOURALIZADEH A., HOSSEINI MOGHADAM S.M.M.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN PYELOPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION. UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2004;1(3):165-169. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/270650/en

    IEEE: Copy

    N. SIMFOROOSH, A. BASIRI, A. TABIBI, A.K. DANESH, F. SHARIFI AGHDAS, S. ZIAEE, A. NOURALIZADEH, and S.M.M. HOSSEINI MOGHADAM, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN PYELOPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION,” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 165–169, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/270650/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button