A COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THEOPHYLLINE AND PLACEBO IN
PASSAGE OF URETERAL STONES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TADAYYON F.; YAZDAN BOUD M.; EBADZADEH M.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: UROLOGY JOURNAL Year:2004 | Volume:1 | Issue:3 Page(s): 204-207

Download Full-Text

View:

252

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THEOPHYLLINE AND PLACEBO IN PASSAGE OF URETERAL STONES

Author(s)

TADAYYON F. | YAZDAN BOUD M. | EBADZADEH M.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

THEOPHYLLINE

UROLITHIASIS

STONE PASSAGE

Abstract

Purpose: Considering the high prevalence of urinary ~ystem stones and that nonmedical treatments have more costs ana side effects, we decided to evaluate the effect of THEOPHYLLINE in the passage of ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty patients with ureteral stones were assigned into groups A and B, whose 1ige,sex, size of stone, and location of stone were matched together. Patients ages ranged from 17 to 67 years. In group A THEOPHYLLINE (200 mg BID) was administered and group B received placebo for six weeks. Both groups were followed up by visits every fortnight and radiological assessment was performed at the end of the sixth week. The proportion of patients whose stones were passed was compared between the two groups. Result: In group A with THEOPHYLLINE consumption 46 out of 75 (61.3%) passed their stones. The mean duration between the initiation of the treatment with THEOPHYLLINE and STONE PASSAGE was18.3 days. In group B with placebo, the STONE PASSAGE occurred in 31 out of 75 (41.3%) patients (p<0.032) and the mean duration was 24.8 days (p<0.05). Conclusion: With regard to the findings of this study, it seems that THEOPHYLLINE can increase the rate of ureteral STONE PASSAGE and as well, accelerate it.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TADAYYON, F., YAZDAN BOUD, M., & EBADZADEH, M.R.. (2004). A COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THEOPHYLLINE AND PLACEBO IN PASSAGE OF URETERAL STONES. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 1(3), 204-207. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/270656/en

Vancouver: Copy

TADAYYON F., YAZDAN BOUD M., EBADZADEH M.R.. A COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THEOPHYLLINE AND PLACEBO IN PASSAGE OF URETERAL STONES. UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2004;1(3):204-207. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/270656/en

IEEE: Copy

F. TADAYYON, M. YAZDAN BOUD, and M.R. EBADZADEH, “A COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THEOPHYLLINE AND PLACEBO IN PASSAGE OF URETERAL STONES,” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 204–207, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/270656/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops