Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

319
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

145
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN THE SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS OF HEMATURIA CAUSES

Pages

  54-60

Abstract

 Introduction: Our aim was to compare transabdominal ULTRASONOGRAPHY (US) and INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY (IVU) in the evaluation of patients with HEMATURIA. Materials and Methods: Two hundred patients with HEMATURIA were assessed by US and IVU, and if needed, by cystoscopy, ureteroscopy, and CT scan, to determine the definite cause of HEMATURIA. The results of US and IVU were compared according to the definite diagnoses. Results: Of 97 patients with microscopic HEMATURIA, 44 (45%) had a documented cause for HEMATURIA, and of 103 patients with gross HEMATURIA, 76 (74%) had a definite disorder (P < .001). URINARY CALCULI were found in 105 patients, 93 (88.5%) and 73 (69.5%) of which were detected by US and IVU, respectively (P < .001). There were 3 and 6 cases of kidney and bladder neoplasms, respectively, all of which were revealed by US, but only 2 renal tumors were detectable on IVU. ULTRASONOGRAPHY had a higher sensitivity than IVU for diagnoses of kidney calculi, lower ureteral calculi, and UROLOGIC NEOPLASMS (95.3% versus 65.1% for kidney calculi, P = .039; 89.7% versus 69.2% for lower ureteral calculi, P < .001; and 100% versus 22.3% for UROLOGIC NEOPLASMS, P < .001), but in calculi of the middle and upper ureter and of the whole ureter, there were no differences between US and IVU.  Conclusion: Our results are in favor of using US in the initial evaluation of HEMATURIA. However, we must choose our diagnostic tool according to the patient's condition and suspected disorders causing HEMATURIA.  

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAJAEI ESFAHANI, M., & MOMENI, A.. (2006). COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN THE SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS OF HEMATURIA CAUSES. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 3(1), 54-60. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/270689/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAJAEI ESFAHANI M., MOMENI A.. COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN THE SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS OF HEMATURIA CAUSES. UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2006;3(1):54-60. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/270689/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. RAJAEI ESFAHANI, and A. MOMENI, “COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY IN THE SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS OF HEMATURIA CAUSES,” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/270689/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top