DONOR NEPHRECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PRESERVATION OF GONADAL VEIN WHILE DISSECTING THE URETER

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALI ASGARI M.; SHAKH SALIM N.; DADKHAH F.; GHADIAN A.R.; HOSSEINI MOGHADAM S.M.M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: UROLOGY JOURNAL Year:2008 | Volume:5 | Issue:3 Page(s): 168-172

Download Full-Text

View:

294

Download:

123

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DONOR NEPHRECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PRESERVATION OF GONADAL VEIN WHILE DISSECTING THE URETER

Author(s)

Keywords

KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

NEPHRECTOMY

BLOOD SUPPLY

URETER

LIVING DONORS

Abstract

Introduction: Preservation of the gonadal vein while dissecting the URETER for donor NEPHRECTOMY may decrease the distal URETERal ischemia and urological complications in kidney transplant recipients. In this study, we compared the outcome of kidney allografts harvested with preservation of the gonadal vein while dissecting the URETER with allografts harvested without preserving the gonadal vein.Materials and Methods: We reviewed 167 consecutive KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATIONs between April 2003 and April 2004. During donor NEPHRECTOMY, we preserved the gonadal vein in 106 harvested kidneys (group 1), while we did not preserve this vein in 61 allografts (group 2). The recipients in each group were followed up for a 2-year follow-up on average, and the outcomes including URETERal complications, graft loss, and patient and graft survival were compared between the two groups.Results: Urine leakage was noted in few patients (2 in group 1 and 3 in group 2) and its frequency was not significantly different between the two groups (P = .26). URETERal stricture was not seen in any of the kidney allograft recipients. No differences were found in the frequencies of acute rejection episodes, graft loss, and death between the two groups.Conclusion: Preservation of the gonadal veins did not significantly decrease the frequency of URETERal complications in the kidney transplant recipients.We recommend meticulous handling of the URETER in donor nephrectomies to prevent further remote complications regardless of the approach to the gonadal veins while NEPHRECTOMY.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ALI ASGARI, M., SHAKH SALIM, N., DADKHAH, F., GHADIAN, A.R., & HOSSEINI MOGHADAM, S.M.M.. (2008). DONOR NEPHRECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PRESERVATION OF GONADAL VEIN WHILE DISSECTING THE URETER. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 5(3), 168-172. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/270845/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALI ASGARI M., SHAKH SALIM N., DADKHAH F., GHADIAN A.R., HOSSEINI MOGHADAM S.M.M.. DONOR NEPHRECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PRESERVATION OF GONADAL VEIN WHILE DISSECTING THE URETER. UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2008;5(3):168-172. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/270845/en

IEEE: Copy

M. ALI ASGARI, N. SHAKH SALIM, F. DADKHAH, A.R. GHADIAN, and S.M.M. HOSSEINI MOGHADAM, “DONOR NEPHRECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT PRESERVATION OF GONADAL VEIN WHILE DISSECTING THE URETER,” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 168–172, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/270845/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops