مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

301
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

182
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY AND LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY METHODS FOR PROXIMAL URETERIC STONES GREATER THAN 10 MM (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASES)

Pages

  2484-2489

Abstract

 Purpose: To examine the outcomes and compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) in patients with proximal ureteral stones larger than 10 mm in diameter.Materials and METHODS: In total, 150 patients who underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and FURS because of ureteral stones in our urology clinic from January 2010 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 70 patients who underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (Group 1) and 80 patients who underwent FURS (Group 2). Success rates and complications were compared.Results: The success rates were 95.7% and 90.0% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. No statistically or clinically significant complications occurred in either group.Conclusion: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and FURS are both effective and reliable for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones. However, considering the shorter operation and hospitalization times and the management of situations that require secondary interventions, we suggest that FURS, as a minimally invasive method, may be the first choice in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

CAVILDAK, IDRIS KIVANC, NALBANT, ISMAIL, TUYGUN, CAN, OZTURK, UFUK, GOKSEL GOKTUG, HASAN NEDIM, BAKIRTAS, HASAN, & IMAMOGLU, MUHAMMED ABDURRAHIM. (2016). COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY AND LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY METHODS FOR PROXIMAL URETERIC STONES GREATER THAN 10 MM (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASES). UROLOGY JOURNAL, 13(1), 2484-2489. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/270992/en

Vancouver: Copy

CAVILDAK IDRIS KIVANC, NALBANT ISMAIL, TUYGUN CAN, OZTURK UFUK, GOKSEL GOKTUG HASAN NEDIM, BAKIRTAS HASAN, IMAMOGLU MUHAMMED ABDURRAHIM. COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY AND LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY METHODS FOR PROXIMAL URETERIC STONES GREATER THAN 10 MM (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASES). UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2016;13(1):2484-2489. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/270992/en

IEEE: Copy

IDRIS KIVANC CAVILDAK, ISMAIL NALBANT, CAN TUYGUN, UFUK OZTURK, HASAN NEDIM GOKSEL GOKTUG, HASAN BAKIRTAS, and MUHAMMED ABDURRAHIM IMAMOGLU, “COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY AND LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY METHODS FOR PROXIMAL URETERIC STONES GREATER THAN 10 MM (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASES),” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 2484–2489, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/270992/en

Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button