مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

297
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

108
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ANESTHESIA METHODS IN TREATMENT OF STAGHORN KIDNEY STONES WITH PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASES)

Pages

  2479-2483

Abstract

 Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of PERCUTANEOUS nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the treatment of staghorn calculi (SC) under spinal ANESTHESIA (SA) versus general ANESTHESIA (GA).Materials and METHODS: Patients with SC who treated with PNL from 2011 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 100 patients were divided into 2 groups according to ANESTHESIA type: SA (group 1, n=47) and GA (group 2, n=53). Demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative analgesic requirements were compared between the two groups.Results: There was no significant difference in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, or stone size between the two groups (P=.40, .30, .18, .20, and.50, respectively). The mean procedure times were 84.7 and 87.5 min in the SA and GA groups, respectively (P=.68). The complication rates were similar in the SA and GA groups (19.1% vs.13.2%, respectively, P=.421). The stone-free rates were also similar in the SA and GA groups (61.7% vs.52.8%, respectively, P=.374). No statistically significant difference was found in analgesic requirements.Conclusion: SA is a safe method without the risks of GA and may be used for conditions in which GA is contraindicated or in patients with concerns about GA. Our outcomes indicated that SC can be treated safely and effectively under SA.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

BULDU, IBRAHIM, TEPELER, ABDULKADIR, KAYNAR, MEHMET, KARATAG, TUNA, TOSUN, MUHAMMED, UMUTOGLU, TARIK, TANRIOVER, HAKAN, & ISTANBULLUOGLU, OKAN. (2016). COMPARISON OF ANESTHESIA METHODS IN TREATMENT OF STAGHORN KIDNEY STONES WITH PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASES). UROLOGY JOURNAL, 13(1), 2479-2483. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/270997/en

Vancouver: Copy

BULDU IBRAHIM, TEPELER ABDULKADIR, KAYNAR MEHMET, KARATAG TUNA, TOSUN MUHAMMED, UMUTOGLU TARIK, TANRIOVER HAKAN, ISTANBULLUOGLU OKAN. COMPARISON OF ANESTHESIA METHODS IN TREATMENT OF STAGHORN KIDNEY STONES WITH PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASES). UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2016;13(1):2479-2483. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/270997/en

IEEE: Copy

IBRAHIM BULDU, ABDULKADIR TEPELER, MEHMET KAYNAR, TUNA KARATAG, MUHAMMED TOSUN, TARIK UMUTOGLU, HAKAN TANRIOVER, and OKAN ISTANBULLUOGLU, “COMPARISON OF ANESTHESIA METHODS IN TREATMENT OF STAGHORN KIDNEY STONES WITH PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASES),” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 2479–2483, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/270997/en

Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button