GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MEHRABI SADROLLAH; MOUSAVI ZADEH ALI; AKBARTABAR TOORI MEHDI; Mehrabi Farhad

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: UROLOGY JOURNAL Year:2013 | Volume:10 | Issue:1 Page(s): 756-761

Download Full-Text

View:

225

Download:

145

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

Author(s)

MEHRABI SADROLLAH | MOUSAVI ZADEH ALI | AKBARTABAR TOORI MEHDI | Mehrabi Farhad | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

percutaneous nephrolithotomy

anesthesia

complications

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and group 2 (n = 58) received spinal anesthesia. In group 1, PCNL was performed using standard technique under general anesthesia. In group 2, spinal anesthesia was done by injecting bupivacaine and fentanyl in spinal space L4 in sitting position. Thereafter, a urethral catheter was placed in lithotomy position, head of the bed was tilted down for 5 to 10 minutes, and the level of anesthesia was checked. Then, PCNL was done by standard technique. complications were recorded and analyzed by SPSS software using Chi-Square and Student’ s t tests. RESULTS: Mean stone size in groups 1 and 2 was 34. 2 ± 9. 8 mm and 31. 3 ± 7. 9 mm, respectively. Intra-operative hypotension and postoperative headache and low back pain were more in spinal group than the general group with a significant difference (P <. 05). No neurologic complication was observed in both groups. Need to narcotic medications on the day of operation in groups 1 and 2 was 12. 4 ± 3. 1 mg and 7. 8 ± 2. 3 mg of morphine sulphate, respectively (P =. 03). The cost of anesthetic drugs was 23 ± 3. 7 US $ and 4. 5 ± 1. 3 US $ in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P =. 001). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia with combined bupivacaine and fentanyl is a safe, effective, and cost-effective method for performing PCNL in adult patients.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MEHRABI, SADROLLAH, MOUSAVI ZADEH, ALI, AKBARTABAR TOORI, MEHDI, & Mehrabi, Farhad. (2013). GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 10(1), 756-761. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/271081/en

Vancouver: Copy

MEHRABI SADROLLAH, MOUSAVI ZADEH ALI, AKBARTABAR TOORI MEHDI, Mehrabi Farhad. GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY. UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2013;10(1):756-761. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/271081/en

IEEE: Copy

SADROLLAH MEHRABI, ALI MOUSAVI ZADEH, MEHDI AKBARTABAR TOORI, and Farhad Mehrabi, “GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY,” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 756–761, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/271081/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops