The Effect of Percutaneous Nephrostomy Implementation on The Outcome of Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Kizilay Fuat; Simsir Adnan; Altay Baris; Nazli Oktay; Cureklibatir ibrahim; Semerci Buent

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: UROLOGY JOURNAL Year:2019 | Volume:16 | Issue:2 Page(s): 115-121

Download Full-Text

View:

211

Download:

105

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Effect of Percutaneous Nephrostomy Implementation on The Outcome of Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment

Author(s)

Keywords

percutaneous nephrostomy

ureterolithiasis

ureteroscopy

urinary diversion

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the effect of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) implementation on the second ureteroscopy (URS) outcomes after a failed URS. Materials and Methods: The data of four hundred forty-eight patients with an unsuccessful URS history were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups; patients who underwent PCN before second URS (Group A) and patients who did not (Group B). We compared the stone access rate in the second URS between the two groups according to patient and stone characteristics and operative data. Then, group A was subdivided into two groups according to stone access as; access succeeded (Group A1) and access failed (Group A2). We also compared stone access rates between these two groups in terms of gender, age, body mass index, stone size, side, location, grade of hydronephrosis and PCN duration. All data were available immediately after surgery and obtained from patient files and the outcome assessment was performed during the study period. Results: Stone access rate was higher in group A than group B (143/196 vs 41/252, P =. 0018). Mean nephrostomy duration and mean hydronephrosis grade were significantly higher and mean stone size was significantly lower in group A1 than group A2 (18. 74 vs 9. 62 days, P <. 001; grade 3. 25 vs 1. 21, P =. 038; and 7. 286 vs 12. 631 mm P <. 001, respectively). Conclusion: PCN is a favourable intervention after a failed URS and increases the success rate of the second operation with ease of implementation and minimal morbidity.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Kizilay, Fuat, Simsir, Adnan, Altay, Baris, Nazli, Oktay, Cureklibatir, ibrahim, & Semerci, Buent. (2019). The Effect of Percutaneous Nephrostomy Implementation on The Outcome of Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 16(2), 115-121. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/271532/en

Vancouver: Copy

Kizilay Fuat, Simsir Adnan, Altay Baris, Nazli Oktay, Cureklibatir ibrahim, Semerci Buent. The Effect of Percutaneous Nephrostomy Implementation on The Outcome of Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment. UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2019;16(2):115-121. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/271532/en

IEEE: Copy

Fuat Kizilay, Adnan Simsir, Baris Altay, Oktay Nazli, ibrahim Cureklibatir, and Buent Semerci, “The Effect of Percutaneous Nephrostomy Implementation on The Outcome of Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment,” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/271532/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops