مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

458
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

116
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE: Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big-Sized Kidney Stones(≥ 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study

Pages

  232-235

Abstract

 Purpose: Management of ≥ 4 cm sized kidney stone is a rarely seen problem in urology. Few studies are present about this issue. percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PNL), retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS) and open surgery are the methods used in stone management. In our study we aimed to compare RIRS and PNL in the management of ≥ 4 cm sized kidney stones. Materials and methods: Among patients who had undergone RIRS and PNL in Dı skapı Yı ldı rı m Beyazı t Training and Research Hospital, 94 patients who had ≥ 4 cm sized kidney stones were included our study. The demographic, intraoperative and postoperative data of these patients and complications were evaluated retrospectively. Results: 94 patients (67 PNL, 27 RIRS) were in the study. Stone laterality, urinary anomaly and gender were similar in two groups. (Group PNL(P) and Group RIRS(R)) Stone number were 2. 55 ± 1. 44 and 2. 78 ± 1. 42 in Group P and R, respectively. Stone size were 47. 06 ± 7. 02 and 46. 41 ± 6. 00 mm. in Group P and R, respectively. The differences between two groups were not statistically significant. (P >. 05) In Group P scopy time, hospital stay and stone free rate were higher and operation time was lower than Group R. And the difference was statistically significant(P <. 05). Conclusions: As a result, PNL is an effective method and operation time is lower than RIRS. Also a second operation for JJ stent taking is lower in PNL. RIRS is a safe method. RIRS has less complications and hospitalization time. They are feasible in treatment of ≥ 4 cm sized kidney stones.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    Karakoyunlu, Ahmet Nihat, Caglar Cakici, Mehmet, Sari, Sercan, Hepsen, Emre, Ozok, Hakki Ugur, Sagnak, Azmi Levent, Topaloglu, Hikmet, Senturk, Aykut Bugra, & Ersoy, Hamit. (2019). ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE: Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big-Sized Kidney Stones(≥ 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 16(3), 232-235. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/271556/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Karakoyunlu Ahmet Nihat, Caglar Cakici Mehmet, Sari Sercan, Hepsen Emre, Ozok Hakki Ugur, Sagnak Azmi Levent, Topaloglu Hikmet, Senturk Aykut Bugra, Ersoy Hamit. ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE: Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big-Sized Kidney Stones(≥ 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study. UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2019;16(3):232-235. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/271556/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Ahmet Nihat Karakoyunlu, Mehmet Caglar Cakici, Sercan Sari, Emre Hepsen, Hakki Ugur Ozok, Azmi Levent Sagnak, Hikmet Topaloglu, Aykut Bugra Senturk, and Hamit Ersoy, “ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE: Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big-Sized Kidney Stones(≥ 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study,” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 232–235, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/271556/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button