مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

636
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

346
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND FEASIBILITY OF THE MAYO GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX QUESTIONNAIRE (GERQ) IN A PERSIAN-SPEAKING POPULATION”

Pages

  64-47

Keywords

GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GERD) 
GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX QUESTIONNAIRE (GERQ) 
WEIGHTED KAPPA STATISTIC (KW) 

Abstract

 Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is prevalent in the West. Mayo-GERQ is one of the most widely used questionnaires for screening GERD. We validated GERQ in an Iranian population.Methods: The Mayo-GERQ was translated into Persian (P-GERQ) and reviewed and commented by two gastroenterologists. Eleven lay-people filled it in and commented on it. RELIABILITY was assessed by test-retest within 2-6 wks in 53 hospital staff.Concurrent-validity was checked in another 53, comparing the results of the self-administered questionnaire with the questionnaires filled in by a gastroenterologist interviewing them. Weighted-kappa (kw) statistics was used. Time needed to complete the questionnaire, practicability of the directions and linguistic eloquence was checked (feasibility indices).Results were used to modify P-GERQ. The modified P-GERQ was tested in another 99 hospital employees in the same manner. Results: Phase-one; One-hundred seventeen subjects were enrolled (46 men). Mean time for completion was 23.7 minutes. Mean kw for RELIABILITY was 0.47 and that for VALIDITY 0.26. Sources of poor performance were sought, P-GERQ was revised and underwent validation again (2nd phase). Phase-two: Ninety-nine individuals were enrolled (37 men). The modified PGERQ took 15.8+/-11.9 min to complete. κ-values for concurrent-validity of major symptoms (acid-regurgitation, heartburn) were 0.70 and 0.67 respectively. Corresponding κ-values for RELIABILITY were 0.57 and 0.80.Conclusions: P-GERQ was not valid initially. After making appropriate technical and linguistic changes, it achieved acceptable VALIDITY, RELIABILITY and FEASIBILITY. In addition to making available a useful tool for population-based studies, our results underscore the importance of validation before adopting a translated questionnaire.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    NASERI MOGHADAM, S., RAZ JOUYAN, H., HABIBI, R., RAFAT ZAND, K., AHRARI, B., NOURAEI, M., MAJDZADEH, R., VAHEDI, H., & MALEKZADEH, R.. (2008). RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND FEASIBILITY OF THE MAYO GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX QUESTIONNAIRE (GERQ) IN A PERSIAN-SPEAKING POPULATION”. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 37(2), 64-47. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/272511/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NASERI MOGHADAM S., RAZ JOUYAN H., HABIBI R., RAFAT ZAND K., AHRARI B., NOURAEI M., MAJDZADEH R., VAHEDI H., MALEKZADEH R.. RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND FEASIBILITY OF THE MAYO GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX QUESTIONNAIRE (GERQ) IN A PERSIAN-SPEAKING POPULATION”. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH[Internet]. 2008;37(2):64-47. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/272511/en

    IEEE: Copy

    S. NASERI MOGHADAM, H. RAZ JOUYAN, R. HABIBI, K. RAFAT ZAND, B. AHRARI, M. NOURAEI, R. MAJDZADEH, H. VAHEDI, and R. MALEKZADEH, “RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND FEASIBILITY OF THE MAYO GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX QUESTIONNAIRE (GERQ) IN A PERSIAN-SPEAKING POPULATION”,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 64–47, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/272511/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button