مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

436
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

244
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

ASSESSING PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF PRESSURE ULCER RISK SCALES- A SYS-TEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Pages

  122-133

Abstract

 Background: The purpose of this study was to present a scientific reason for PRESSURE ULCER risk scales: Cubbin& Jack-son modified Braden, Norton, and Waterlow, as a nursing diagnosis tool by utilizing predictive validity of pressure sores.Methods: Articles published between 1966 and 2013 from periodicals indexed in the Ovid Medline, Embase, CI-NAHL, KoreaMed, NDSL, and other databases were selected using the key word "PRESSURE ULCER". QUADAS-Ⅱ was applied for assessment for internal validity of the diagnostic studies. Selected studies were analyzed using META-ANALYSIS with MetaDisc 1.4.Results: Seventeen diagnostic studies with high methodological quality, involving 5, 185 patients, were included. In the results of the META-ANALYSIS, sROC AUC of Braden, Norton, and Waterflow scale was over 0.7, showing moderate predictive validity, but they have limited interpretation due to significant differences between studies. In addition, Wa-terlow scale is insufficient as a screening tool owing to low SENSITIVITY compared with other scales.Conclusion: The contemporary PRESSURE ULCER risk scale is not suitable for uninform practice on patients under stan-dardized criteria. Therefore, in order to provide more effective nursing care for bedsores, a new or modified PRESSURE ULCER risk scale should be developed upon strength and weaknesses of existing tools.

Cites

References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    PARK, SEONG HI, & LEE, HEA SHOON. (2016). ASSESSING PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF PRESSURE ULCER RISK SCALES- A SYS-TEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 45(2), 122-133. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/273982/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    PARK SEONG HI, LEE HEA SHOON. ASSESSING PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF PRESSURE ULCER RISK SCALES- A SYS-TEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH[Internet]. 2016;45(2):122-133. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/273982/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEONG HI PARK, and HEA SHOON LEE, “ASSESSING PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF PRESSURE ULCER RISK SCALES- A SYS-TEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 122–133, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/273982/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button