مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

354
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

144
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PCR AND CULTURE METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF ENTEROPATHOGENIC CAMPYLOBACTER IN FOWL FECES

Pages

  47-50

Abstract

 Enteritis due to CAMPYLOBACTER is the most common cause of acute bacterial diarrhea worldwide. In most cases, infection occurs as a result of consuming contaminated water or food, especially raw meat of FOWLs. CAMPYLOBACTERs are saccharolytic and fastidious bacteria. These traits limit the number of available biochemical tests by which isolates may be differentiated. These limitations might, in principle, be overcome by the use of PCR techniques, which is the aim of the present study. To compare the CULTURE technique with PCR assay, a total of 116 fecal samples from FOWLs were tested using these two techniques for the presence of CAMPYLOBACTERs. CAMPYLOBACTER strains were isolated from 11 (9.4%) out of 116 fecal CULTUREs from FOWLs (8 C. jejuni and 3 C. coli). Using PCR assays, the number of positive CAMPYLOBACTERs increased to 27 (23%). Of these 27 positive samples, 18 were C. jejuni and 9 were C. coli. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR in comparison to the CULTURE method were found to be 100 and 84.7%, respectively. According to the present study, it is proposed that the PCR is a reliable and sensitive method which can be used as a diagnostic technique for the detection of CAMPYLOBACTER in FOWLs’ samples.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HAVAEI, S.A., FAZELI, S.A., SALEHI, R., & BOKAEIAN, M.. (2006). COMPARISON OF PCR AND CULTURE METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF ENTEROPATHOGENIC CAMPYLOBACTER IN FOWL FECES. IRANIAN BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 10(1), 47-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/277090/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HAVAEI S.A., FAZELI S.A., SALEHI R., BOKAEIAN M.. COMPARISON OF PCR AND CULTURE METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF ENTEROPATHOGENIC CAMPYLOBACTER IN FOWL FECES. IRANIAN BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2006;10(1):47-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/277090/en

    IEEE: Copy

    S.A. HAVAEI, S.A. FAZELI, R. SALEHI, and M. BOKAEIAN, “COMPARISON OF PCR AND CULTURE METHODS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF ENTEROPATHOGENIC CAMPYLOBACTER IN FOWL FECES,” IRANIAN BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 47–50, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/277090/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button