COMPARISON OF VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE AND FACES RATING SCALE IN MEASURING ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FADAEIZADEH L.; EMAMI HABIB; SAMIEI K.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE Year:2009 | Volume:12 | Issue:1 Page(s): 73-75

Download Full-Text

View:

439

Download:

1,070

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE AND FACES RATING SCALE IN MEASURING ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN

Author(s)

FADAEIZADEH L. | EMAMI HABIB | SAMIEI K. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FACES RATING SCALE (FRS)

PAIN

VISUAL ANALOG SCALE

Abstract

Several PAIN assessment tools have been proposed for use in different settings, but neither have been validated for all patients, especially Iranians.We conducted this study to compare the accuracy of two most commonly used tools for evaluation of PAIN intensity in a group of postoperative Iranian patients.All postoperative patients admitted to the surgical wards of Masih Daneshvari and Rasoul Akram Hospitals, Tehran, Iran were studied. During a two-month period, patients were evaluated for PAIN intensity within 24 hours of operation. Visual analogue scale and faces rating scale were used for this purpose.Eighty- two patients were enrolled into the study. Forty-eight patients underwent obstetrics and 34 had general surgeries. Using Spearman analysis, we found a linear correlation between the results of the two methods (P=0.952). Using multivariate analysis, we found that none of the variables such as age, gender, and education level had significant effects on correlation between visual analogue scale and faces rating scale.Visual analogue scale and faces rating scale are two PAIN assessment tools that can be used interchangeably for evaluation of acute postoperative PAIN.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

FADAEIZADEH, L., EMAMI, HABIB, & SAMIEI, K.. (2009). COMPARISON OF VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE AND FACES RATING SCALE IN MEASURING ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 12(1), 73-75. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/280385/en

Vancouver: Copy

FADAEIZADEH L., EMAMI HABIB, SAMIEI K.. COMPARISON OF VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE AND FACES RATING SCALE IN MEASURING ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE[Internet]. 2009;12(1):73-75. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/280385/en

IEEE: Copy

L. FADAEIZADEH, HABIB EMAMI, and K. SAMIEI, “COMPARISON OF VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE AND FACES RATING SCALE IN MEASURING ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN,” ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 73–75, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/280385/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops