مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

268
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

122
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Different Strategies in Simultaneous Coronary and Carotid Artery Revascularization – A Single Center Experience

Pages

  132-136

Keywords

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) 
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) 
Percutaneous coronary angiography (PCI) 

Abstract

 Background: The optimal management for patients with concomitant severe coronary artery disease (CAD) and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) remains controversial. We reported our preliminary experience on a synchronous hybrid strategy. Methods: Seven patients with synchronous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/carotid endarterectomy (CEA)/coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 36 patients with synchronous CEA/CABG were enrolled. Then we analyzed the demographics, risk factors and 30-day results of the 2 groups, retrospectively. Results: The 2 groups were comparable in demographics. The operation time was 312. 14 ± 40. 08 minutes for synchronous PCI/CEA/CABG and 294. 58 ± 47. 62 minutes for synchronous CEA/CABG (P = 0. 367). The intraoperative blood loss was 814. 29± 195. 18 mL for synchronous PCI/CEA/CABG and 769. 44 ± 330. 21 mL for synchronous CEA/CABG (P = 0. 731). There was no death in the 2 groups within 30 days. The incidence of primary endpoint [stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and death] was 14. 29% (1/7) in synchronous PCI/CEA/CABG group and 5. 56% (2/36) in synchronous CEA/CABG group. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P = 0. 421). Conclusion: Synchronous PCI, CEA and CABG may be safe and effective in the management of patients with concomitant CAS and complicated multi-vessel CAD. The current data suggested that more studies and randomized controlled trials may be necessary to define whether this strategy is suitable for these patients.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    Zhang, Jianbin, Dong, Zhiqiang, Liu, Peng, Fan, Xueqiang, CHEN, JIE, Zheng, Xia, Ma, Bo, & Ye, Zhidong. (2019). Different Strategies in Simultaneous Coronary and Carotid Artery Revascularization – A Single Center Experience. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 22(3), 132-136. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/281819/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Zhang Jianbin, Dong Zhiqiang, Liu Peng, Fan Xueqiang, CHEN JIE, Zheng Xia, Ma Bo, Ye Zhidong. Different Strategies in Simultaneous Coronary and Carotid Artery Revascularization – A Single Center Experience. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE[Internet]. 2019;22(3):132-136. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/281819/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Jianbin Zhang, Zhiqiang Dong, Peng Liu, Xueqiang Fan, JIE CHEN, Xia Zheng, Bo Ma, and Zhidong Ye, “Different Strategies in Simultaneous Coronary and Carotid Artery Revascularization – A Single Center Experience,” ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 132–136, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/281819/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button