A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF SONOGRAPHY VS. BARIUM SWALLOW IN GASTROESDOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAHDIZADEH M.; ZANDIE F.; JANATI J.; AKHAVAN MALAYERI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Radiology Year:2003 | Volume:1 | Issue:3-4 Page(s): 147-149

Download Full-Text

View:

335

Download:

151

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF SONOGRAPHY VS. BARIUM SWALLOW IN GASTROESDOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN

Author(s)

MAHDIZADEH M. | ZANDIE F. | JANATI J. | AKHAVAN MALAYERI A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SONOGRAPHY

BARIUM SWALLOW

PH MONITORING

GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX

Abstract

Background: One of the common problems in children, especially infants, is gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Objectives: This study was performed to compare the diagnostic value of lower esophageal SONOGRAPHY with that of BARIUM SWALLOW. Patients and method: Our trial was a triple-blind, performed on 50 patients of 1 month to 15 years of age. The patients suspicious of having GER were evaluated by SONOGRAPHY and BARIUM SWALLOW. Esophageal PH MONITORING was the standard test, and both the ultrasound and BARIUM SWALLOW were compared to it. Results: The results showed that SONOGRAPHY was 90% sensitive, vs. 50% for BARIUM SWALLOW. Both tests had the same specificity equal to 35%. Conclusion: We concluded that SONOGRAPHY was a better test than BARIUM SWALLOWs, for evaluation of suspected patients with GER, and screening of the infants.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAHDIZADEH, M., ZANDIE, F., JANATI, J., & AKHAVAN MALAYERI, A.. (2003). A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF SONOGRAPHY VS. BARIUM SWALLOW IN GASTROESDOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1(3-4), 147-149. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/283531/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAHDIZADEH M., ZANDIE F., JANATI J., AKHAVAN MALAYERI A.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF SONOGRAPHY VS. BARIUM SWALLOW IN GASTROESDOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY[Internet]. 2003;1(3-4):147-149. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/283531/en

IEEE: Copy

M. MAHDIZADEH, F. ZANDIE, J. JANATI, and A. AKHAVAN MALAYERI, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF SONOGRAPHY VS. BARIUM SWALLOW IN GASTROESDOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, vol. 1, no. 3-4, pp. 147–149, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/283531/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops