COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND BRUSH CYTOLOGY WITH GASTIC BIOPSY AND UREASE TEST FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ENSANI F.; MALEKI Z.; EBRAHIMI DARYANI N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HAKIM RESEARCH JOURNAL Year:2006 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 Page(s): 45-49

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

777

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND BRUSH CYTOLOGY WITH GASTIC BIOPSY AND UREASE TEST FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI

Author(s)

ENSANI F. | MALEKI Z. | EBRAHIMI DARYANI N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HELICOBACTER PYLORIQ4

GASTRIC CYTOLOGY TOUCH CYTOLOGYQ3

BRUSH CYTOLOGYQ3

BIOPSYQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Detection of H. pylori, the widely distributed etiologic agent of gastro-duodenal inflammation, peptic ulcer and gastric cancer, is easy and available.Methods: In this study, 100 patients who visited endoscopy section of Imam Khomeini Hospital or private clinic in 2001 were studied for gastric cytology (brushing and touch preparation) and BIOPSY.Results: Of 100 studied patients, 31 patients (31%) had abnormal endoscopy, including gastritis in 78%. Brushing was positive in 43 (43%) patients, touch preparation in 52 (52%), rapid urease test (RUT) in 53% and BIOPSY in 54(54%) of patients. Sensitivity of brush and touch cytology were 79.6% and 96.3%, respectively.Conclusion: Agreement between brush and touch cytology was 78.1%. According to of Mc-Nemar test they had no concordance. Sensitivity of RUT was 98.1%. Agreement between touch cytology and BIOPSY was 96% and according to Mc-Nemar test they showed concordance.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ENSANI, F., MALEKI, Z., & EBRAHIMI DARYANI, N.. (2006). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND BRUSH CYTOLOGY WITH GASTIC BIOPSY AND UREASE TEST FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI. HAKIM RESEARCH JOURNAL, 9(2), 45-49. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/29195/en

Vancouver: Copy

ENSANI F., MALEKI Z., EBRAHIMI DARYANI N.. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND BRUSH CYTOLOGY WITH GASTIC BIOPSY AND UREASE TEST FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI. HAKIM RESEARCH JOURNAL[Internet]. 2006;9(2):45-49. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/29195/en

IEEE: Copy

F. ENSANI, Z. MALEKI, and N. EBRAHIMI DARYANI, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND BRUSH CYTOLOGY WITH GASTIC BIOPSY AND UREASE TEST FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI,” HAKIM RESEARCH JOURNAL, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 45–49, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/29195/en

Related Journal Papers