COMPARING TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTERPYLORI OF GASTRIC BIOPSIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

VAHIDI SH.; SHAKERI JOUSHAGHAN ABAS; AZADEGAN M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Research in Medicine Year:2003 | Volume:26 | Issue:4 Page(s): 241-244

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,572

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTERPYLORI OF GASTRIC BIOPSIES

Author(s)

VAHIDI SH. | SHAKERI JOUSHAGHAN ABAS | AZADEGAN M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HELICOBACTER PYLORIQ3

TOUCH CYTOLOGYQ3

HISTOPATHOLOGYQ2

Abstract

Background: HELICOBACTER PYLORI (HP) has been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, intestinal metaplasia, atrophic gastritis, gastric carcinoma, and maltoma. Thus, determining the colonization of HP could be helpful for therapeutic approaches.Materials and methods: Touch smear of gastric biopsies were obtained from 72 patients referring to Endoscopy unit of Loghman Hakim hospital. Being exposed to the air, Giemsa staining was employed. Then, results of TOUCH CYTOLOGY were compared with HISTOPATHOLOGY. Results: Regarding the presence of HP, cytology and HISTOPATHOLOGY were in full agreement in 93% of the cases. In the remaining 7% of cases, cytology was positive and HISTOPATHOLOGY was negative. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of TOUCH CYTOLOGY in HP detection were revealed to be 100, 87, and 93%, respectively. PPV and NPV of this method were 87 and 100%, respectively.Conclusion: TOUCH CYTOLOGY is rapid, easy, and reliable technique for HP detection.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

VAHIDI, SH., SHAKERI JOUSHAGHAN, ABAS, & AZADEGAN, M.. (2003). COMPARING TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTERPYLORI OF GASTRIC BIOPSIES. PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI, 26(4), 241-244. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/41625/en

Vancouver: Copy

VAHIDI SH., SHAKERI JOUSHAGHAN ABAS, AZADEGAN M.. COMPARING TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTERPYLORI OF GASTRIC BIOPSIES. PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI[Internet]. 2003;26(4):241-244. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/41625/en

IEEE: Copy

SH. VAHIDI, ABAS SHAKERI JOUSHAGHAN, and M. AZADEGAN, “COMPARING TOUCH CYTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTERPYLORI OF GASTRIC BIOPSIES,” PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 241–244, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/41625/en

Related Journal Papers