مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

326
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

107
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF HIGH FREQUENCY POSITIVE PRESSURE MECHANICAL VENTILATION (HFPPV) WITH CONVENTIONAL METHOD IN THE TREATMENT OF NEONATAL RESPIRATORY FAILURE

Pages

  183-186

Abstract

 Background: Respiratory failure is a major problem in neonatal medicine in all over the world and has different causes. Using mechanical VENTILATION is one of its major treatments.Objectives: Different strategies have been expressed in this context, including high frequency mechanical VENTILATION.Patients and Methods: This study is a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted on all NEWBORNs with respiratory failure hospitalized in the NICU of Tehran vali-asr Hospital during 2009.These patients were divided in to two groups through block Randomization method; conventional mechanical VENTILATION group and high frequency VENTILATION group.Results: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and air leak (e.g. pneumothorax) were less in HFPPV group than conventional group (P=0.012 and P=0.038). The mean time needed for mechanical VENTILATION was lower in HFPPV group, but this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.922). Needing to O2 in 28 days of age was almost equal in both groups (P=0.99). Mortality, and refractory hypoxia and PVL were lower in HFPPV group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.301, P=0.508, P=0.113).Conclusions: Treatment of neonatal respiratory failure with high rate mechanical VENTILATION may reduce some complications.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AMINI, ELAHE, NAYERI, FATEMEH SADAT, HEMATI, AREZU, ESMAEILINIA, TAHERE, NILI, FIRUZEH, DALILI, HOSSEIN, & AMINNEJAD, MAJID. (2013). COMPARISON OF HIGH FREQUENCY POSITIVE PRESSURE MECHANICAL VENTILATION (HFPPV) WITH CONVENTIONAL METHOD IN THE TREATMENT OF NEONATAL RESPIRATORY FAILURE. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), 15(3), 183-186. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/292833/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AMINI ELAHE, NAYERI FATEMEH SADAT, HEMATI AREZU, ESMAEILINIA TAHERE, NILI FIRUZEH, DALILI HOSSEIN, AMINNEJAD MAJID. COMPARISON OF HIGH FREQUENCY POSITIVE PRESSURE MECHANICAL VENTILATION (HFPPV) WITH CONVENTIONAL METHOD IN THE TREATMENT OF NEONATAL RESPIRATORY FAILURE. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ)[Internet]. 2013;15(3):183-186. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/292833/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ELAHE AMINI, FATEMEH SADAT NAYERI, AREZU HEMATI, TAHERE ESMAEILINIA, FIRUZEH NILI, HOSSEIN DALILI, and MAJID AMINNEJAD, “COMPARISON OF HIGH FREQUENCY POSITIVE PRESSURE MECHANICAL VENTILATION (HFPPV) WITH CONVENTIONAL METHOD IN THE TREATMENT OF NEONATAL RESPIRATORY FAILURE,” IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 183–186, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/292833/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button